SAMPLE — redacted — a real build of this report. Only the first row is named; below it the organization name, EIN, FAC link and report id are blank and dollars are shown as a band. The columns, scores and signals are what the paid file holds.

AuditRadar
PUBLIC DATA. REAL OPPORTUNITY. · GETAUDITRADAR.COM

NONPROFITS
CREATE IMPACT.
YOU FIND
OPPORTUNITY.

TERRITORY REPORTFOR CPA FIRMS

Nonprofit

Texas Nonprofit
Audit Opportunity Report

PUBLIC RECORD. LINKED EVIDENCE. YOUR JUDGEMENT.

HIGHER
VISIBILITY.
BIGGER
OPPORTUNITIES.

Prepared for:
Your firm
Territory:
Texas (TX)
Data as of:
2026-10-30
Published by:
AuditRadar · getauditradar.com
Ranked accounts300 nonprofit accounts scored in this territory
Auditor changes observed54 -17% statewide FY2024 vs FY2023 latest filing names a different firm than the prior year
First single audits181 -1% statewide FY2024 vs FY2023 first single audit filing observed
Entered the threshold181 +19% statewide FY2024 vs FY2023 federal expenditures reached the applicable threshold
Open solicitations0 open on the generation date, read from the issuer's page

Turn information into opportunity

This report ranks 300 nonprofit accounts in Texas against what changed on the public record, alongside 0 open solicitations and 235 audit firms observed here. Those accounts report $3,332,428,415 in federal expenditures across 300 of 300 that reported a figure. The FAC data runs to 2026-10-30, and every row links to the filing it came from.

  • See what changed on the public record
  • Open the source filing behind every row
  • Work the territory in a documented order
“

Public data.
Real opportunities.
Stronger communities.

Open audit & accounting solicitations (0)

Explicit demand · worked first
Posted in public

No solicitation in Texas was open on 2026-11-02. The accounts below are ranked on what changed in the public record instead of on a posted solicitation.

Top accounts to review

Higher potential · smarter outreach
Ranked by opportunity signal

The 25 highest-ranked of 300 accounts. Fit is how well the organization matches a regional nonprofit audit practice; Opp. is the weight of what changed on the public record; Conf. is how far the underlying identifiers can be trusted. The top 300 are in 02_high_signal_accounts.csv.

A blank cell means the source did not report the value — see coverage_flags in the CSV.
#OrganizationEINCity Federal expendituresPrimary signal Most recently observed auditor FitOpp.Conf. EvidenceNext step
1 Permian Basin Regional Council on Alcohol and Drug Abuse Odessa $1,422,392 Auditor changed Boring & Company, PC 75 60 HIGH View →FAC 2025-08-GSAFAC-0000424887 Review filing
2 Name in the full report Plainview $1M–$2M Paid preparer changed (990) THOMAS & COMPANY CPA PA 73 54 HIGH Review filing
3 Name in the full report Austin Under $750K Paid preparer changed (990) MONTEMAYOR BRITTON BENDER CAREY PC 69 50 MEDIUM Review filing
4 Name in the full report San Antonio $2M–$5M Auditor changed Aprio, LLP 61 50 HIGH Review filing
5 Name in the full report Port Authur $2M–$5M Auditor changed Carr Riggs & Ingram 81 49 HIGH Review filing
6 Name in the full report Houston $1M–$2M New significant deficiency 721396621 82 46 HIGH Add to watch
7 Name in the full report Temple $1M–$2M New material noncompliance 742243906 86 45 HIGH Add to watch
8 Name in the full report Desoto $2M–$5M Auditor changed Logan and Associates PC 64 45 HIGH Review filing
9 Name in the full report Houston $5M–$10M New significant deficiency CARR, RIGGS & INGRAM, LLC 94 43 HIGH Add to watch
10 Name in the full report San Antonio $2M–$5M New significant deficiency COHNREZNICK LLP 60 43 HIGH Add to watch
11 Name in the full report Dallas $750K–$1M Paid preparer changed (990) Vail & Park, P.C. 68 42 HIGH Review filing
12 Name in the full report Grand Prairie $1M–$2M First single audit Bonadio & Co., LLP 59 42 HIGH Review filing
13 Name in the full report Houston $2M–$5M New significant deficiency McConnell Jones LLP 91 40 HIGH Add to watch
14 Name in the full report Houston $5M–$10M Auditor changed Whitley Penn, LLP 87 40 HIGH Review filing
15 Name in the full report Waxahachie $5M–$10M Paid preparer changed (990) Scott, Singleton, Fincher & Co 81 40 HIGH Review filing
16 Name in the full report Dallas $25M–$100M Finance lead changed (990) Armanino LLP 81 40 HIGH Add to watch
17 Name in the full report Fort Worth $1M–$2M Paid preparer changed (990) SUTTON FROST CARY LLP 66 40 HIGH Review filing
18 Name in the full report Dallas $5M–$10M Auditor changed CohnReznick LLP 94 39 HIGH Review filing
19 Name in the full report Aus $2M–$5M New significant deficiency Sutton Frost Cary, LLP 82 39 HIGH Add to watch
20 Name in the full report San Antonio $2M–$5M Finance lead changed (990) ADKF, PC 79 39 HIGH Add to watch
21 Name in the full report Houston $2M–$5M New material weakness NORTON COLLAR LUND LILLY, PLLC 71 39 HIGH Add to watch
22 Name in the full report Dallas $2M–$5M Finance lead changed (990) Sutton Frost Cary, LLP 88 38 HIGH Add to watch
23 Name in the full report Austin $10M–$25M Executive changed (990) 742902112 81 38 MEDIUM Add to watch
24 Name in the full report Smithville $750K–$1M First single audit Martinez, Rosario & Company, LLP 61 38 HIGH Review filing
25 Name in the full report San Antonio $25M–$100M New material weakness M Group, LLP 94 37 MEDIUM Add to watch

Next step follows the signal's tier, and is advice about your own desk rather than anything observed about the organization. Read RFP — an open solicitation. Review filing — a direct change on the latest filing. Add to watch — a complexity change. Diary FYE — a timing signal only.

Why these accounts, in the filings' own terms

The evidence sentence, unedited

Read this before the score. It names what was observed, when, and in which filing. Nothing in it is inferred beyond what the cited filing says, and none of it is a statement that an organization intends to change providers — that judgement is yours.

Permian Basin Regional Council on Alcohol and Drug Abuse

FAC audit year 2025 (report 2025-08-GSAFAC-0000424887) reports $1,422,392 in federal expenditures across 5 programs; the auditor firm on the 2025 report (Boring & Company, PC) differs from the prior observed year (Randy Silhan, CPA, CFE); the auditor firm on the 2024 report (Randy Silhan, CPA, CFE) differs from the prior observed year (WHITLEY PENN LLP); the paid preparer on the Form 990 for the period ending 2025-08 (Boring & Company PC) differs from the prior filing (RANDY SILHAN CPA CFE); a significant deficiency is disclosed for 2025 (none the prior year).

Opportunity themes in Texas

Key trends driving nonprofit audit demand
  • 181Entered threshold Federal expenditures reached the threshold applicable to that fiscal year start: $750,000 before 2024-10-01, $1,000,000 on or after.
  • 181First single audit The first single audit filing observed for this organization.
  • 165Fiscal year-end within 90 days The fiscal year end on the latest filing has its next anniversary within 90 days of the data date. It is not a statement about an organization's filing status.
  • 140Auditor changed A different firm than last year; not a rename or a combination.
  • 126New significant deficiency The latest filing discloses a significant deficiency the prior one did not.
  • 111Federal spend growth Federal expenditures grew materially against the prior filing.

How to work this report

Turn the sheets into a call list
  1. Start with the open solicitations: those organizations have said in public that they are buying.
  2. Then work the ranked accounts from the top. The order is Opportunity Signal, then ICP Fit, then Data Confidence — the same order as 02_high_signal_accounts.csv.
  3. Read the evidence sentence before the score. It names what was observed, when, and in which filing; the judgement about what it means is yours.
  4. Open the FAC link on any account you act on and confirm the figures at the source; check a solicitation deadline on the issuer's own page before you build to it, because deadlines move.
  5. Filter the CSV on your own criteria: every column in the sheets is documented in 00_data_dictionary.csv.

Signal legend

Opportunity signal types
Every signal used above
Auditor changed

A different firm than last year; not a rename or a combination.

Paid preparer changed (990)

The paid preparer signing the latest Form 990 differs from the prior return's.

First single audit

The first single audit filing observed for this organization.

New significant deficiency

The latest filing discloses a significant deficiency the prior one did not.

New material noncompliance

The latest filing discloses material noncompliance the prior one did not.

Finance lead changed (990)

The finance lead named on the latest Form 990 differs from the prior return's.

New material weakness

The latest filing discloses a material weakness the prior one did not.

Executive changed (990)

The officer named on the latest Form 990 differs from the prior return's.

Incumbent landscape

Who you are competing with
Top 10 firms

Audit firms observed on nonprofit single audits in this territory over the two most recent audit years, largest practice first — and the size of work each one is winning.

Audit firmNonprofit audits (2 years) Median federal expenditures
SUTTON FROST CARY LLP76 $2,018,138
BLAZEK & VETTERLING54 $2,611,590
BKD, LLP48 $8,869,634
MADDOX & ASSOCIATES, APC42 $1,424,095
CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLP34 $3,320,570
RANDY WALKER & CO.31 $1,580,672
CARR, RIGGS & INGRAM, LLC28 $5,584,496
LAPORTE, APAC27 $5,041,604
PITTSFORD SAMUELS, PLLC27 $3,067,640
MONTEMAYOR BRITTON BENDER PC26 $1,830,942

How to read the scores

The legend travels with the file
ICP Fit
0-100. How well the account matches a regional nonprofit audit practice: size, complexity and geography.
Opportunity Signal
0-100. The weight of what changed on the public record — tier A a direct change (auditor changed, first single audit, entered the threshold), tier B a complexity change (federal spend growth, new findings), tier T timing.
Data Confidence
HIGH, MEDIUM or LOW, from identifier quality, recency and resubmission status.
Blank cell
The source did not report the value; see coverage_flags in the CSV. A missing number is left blank rather than reported as a zero.

What is in this download

Column definitions in 00_data_dictionary.csv
01_open_rfps.csvEvery solicitation open on the generation date, with its deadline quoted from the issuer's page and a link to that page.
02_high_signal_accounts.csvThe ranked accounts, one row each, with the scores, the evidence sentence and the FAC report behind it.
03_incumbent_landscape.csvThe audit firms observed in this territory, with how many nonprofit audits each one signed.
04_program_context.csvThe federal programs behind each account, ten largest first.
00_data_dictionary.csvEvery exported column, what it means, and the export's own metadata: sources, method version, date format, known limits.
auditradar_<ST>_<date>.xlsxThe same four tables in one workbook, formatted, with a data dictionary; its first sheet is the formatted first page of the data.
summary.pdf / summary.htmlThis summary, to read or to forward.
summary_dark.htmlThe same summary in the dark theme.
csv_data_report.pdfThe CSV files explained: the first rows, every column, how to read the signals and the outreach priority.
manifest.jsonThe FAC extract this build came from, by checksum, and the profile used.

Methodology & evidence

How this file was built

What this is: a ranked list of nonprofit audit/accounting pursuit opportunities built from public Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) data and publicly posted RFPs. Every row links to its FAC report (app.fac.gov/dissemination/summary/<report_id>) or to the original RFP page.

Sheets: 01_open_rfps = solicitations checked automatically against the issuer page on the date shown in last_verified_at. 02_high_signal_accounts = accounts ranked by Opportunity Signal, then ICP Fit, then Data Confidence. 03_incumbent_landscape = audit firms observed in FAC for this territory. 04_program_context = federal programs per account (top 10 by expenditure).

How to read the scores: ICP Fit (0-100) = how well the account matches a regional nonprofit audit practice (size, complexity, geography). Opportunity Signal (0-100) = inferred evidence of change: A direct change (auditor change, first single audit, entered threshold), B complexity change (federal spend growth, new findings), T timing (new or missing FAC filing). Open RFPs are explicit demand: they are listed first and in 01_open_rfps, never added into the score (primary_signal_tier S). Data Confidence = HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW based on identifier quality, recency and resubmission status.

What the words mean: "fac_fiscal_year_end" = the fiscal year end date on the latest FAC report; "fiscal year end approaching" means that date's next anniversary falls within 90 days of the data date, and "no FAC submission observed" means the Clearinghouse shows no report for the following fiscal year as of the data date — neither is a statement about an organization's filing status, nor that it is seeking proposals. "most recently observed auditor" = the auditor firm named on the latest FAC report; it is not a statement about a current contract. "Auditor changed" = the firm on a report differs from the firm on the report for the year before it, not counting a renamed or re-spelled firm or one that appears to have combined into another; the evidence sentence names the years. "Appears to have entered Single Audit-relevant level" = federal expenditures at/above the threshold applicable to that fiscal-year start ($750,000 before 2024-10-01; $1,000,000 on/after).

Coverage: blank cells with a coverage_flags entry mean the source did not report the value. We never display a missing value as $0. Form 990 columns (accounting fees, paid preparer, latest 990 tax period) come from the IRS Form 990 e-file data as filed; they are blank and flagged SOURCE_NOT_COVERED while a return has not been read yet, NOT_REQUIRED when the organization does not have to file a 990 with financial data, and NOT_APPLICABLE for a Form 990-EZ, which has no accounting-fee line. Form 990 accounting fees are not the price of an audit engagement: line 11c covers every accounting service bought that year - bookkeeping, the tax return, the audit - so read it as a ceiling on the audit fee rather than the fee (03_01 section 20.11). NTEE code, 501(c) subsection, revenue, assets and tax period come from the IRS Exempt Organizations Business Master File: they are the IRS's figures from the organization's latest return, not current financials.

Freshness: FAC public data is refreshed by GSA typically weekly. This report reflects the FAC extract identified in manifest.json (sha256 of general.csv). RFP status is as checked on the date in last_verified_at; deadlines can change — always confirm on the issuer's page.

The change shown on a headline card compares the two most recent complete audit years of Clearinghouse filings for this state, counted the same way in both, and names them on the card. A year counts as complete once its filing window has closed: nine months after the latest fiscal year end in it (2 CFR 200.512), plus ninety days for filings accepted after the due date. A year still being filed is not compared, because an unfinished year reads as a collapse. A card shows no change where there is no prior figure.

Not affiliated with the U.S. General Services Administration or the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. This report is sales-prioritization information, not legal, audit, or procurement advice, and makes no claim that any organization intends to change providers.

Public data.
Real opportunities.
Stronger communities.