SAMPLE — redacted — a real build of this report. Only the first row is named; below it the organization name, EIN, FAC link and report id are blank and dollars are shown as a band. The columns, scores and signals are what the paid file holds.
NONPROFITS
CREATE IMPACT.
YOU FIND
OPPORTUNITY.
Nonprofit
PUBLIC RECORD. LINKED EVIDENCE. YOUR JUDGEMENT.
HIGHER
VISIBILITY.
BIGGER
OPPORTUNITIES.
This report ranks 300 nonprofit accounts in Texas against what changed on the public record, alongside 0 open solicitations and 235 audit firms observed here. Those accounts report $3,332,428,415 in federal expenditures across 300 of 300 that reported a figure. The FAC data runs to 2026-10-30, and every row links to the filing it came from.
Public data.
Real opportunities.
Stronger communities.
No solicitation in Texas was open on 2026-11-02. The accounts below are ranked on what changed in the public record instead of on a posted solicitation.
The 25 highest-ranked of 300 accounts. Fit is how well the organization matches a regional nonprofit audit practice; Opp. is the weight of what changed on the public record; Conf. is how far the underlying identifiers can be trusted. The top 300 are in 02_high_signal_accounts.csv.
| # | Organization | EIN | City | Federal expenditures | Primary signal | Most recently observed auditor | Fit | Opp. | Conf. | Evidence | Next step |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Permian Basin Regional Council on Alcohol and Drug Abuse | Odessa | $1,422,392 | Auditor changed | Boring & Company, PC | 75 | 60 | HIGH | View →FAC 2025-08-GSAFAC-0000424887 | Review filing | |
| 2 | Name in the full report | Plainview | $1M–$2M | Paid preparer changed (990) | THOMAS & COMPANY CPA PA | 73 | 54 | HIGH | Review filing | ||
| 3 | Name in the full report | Austin | Under $750K | Paid preparer changed (990) | MONTEMAYOR BRITTON BENDER CAREY PC | 69 | 50 | MEDIUM | Review filing | ||
| 4 | Name in the full report | San Antonio | $2M–$5M | Auditor changed | Aprio, LLP | 61 | 50 | HIGH | Review filing | ||
| 5 | Name in the full report | Port Authur | $2M–$5M | Auditor changed | Carr Riggs & Ingram | 81 | 49 | HIGH | Review filing | ||
| 6 | Name in the full report | Houston | $1M–$2M | New significant deficiency | 721396621 | 82 | 46 | HIGH | Add to watch | ||
| 7 | Name in the full report | Temple | $1M–$2M | New material noncompliance | 742243906 | 86 | 45 | HIGH | Add to watch | ||
| 8 | Name in the full report | Desoto | $2M–$5M | Auditor changed | Logan and Associates PC | 64 | 45 | HIGH | Review filing | ||
| 9 | Name in the full report | Houston | $5M–$10M | New significant deficiency | CARR, RIGGS & INGRAM, LLC | 94 | 43 | HIGH | Add to watch | ||
| 10 | Name in the full report | San Antonio | $2M–$5M | New significant deficiency | COHNREZNICK LLP | 60 | 43 | HIGH | Add to watch | ||
| 11 | Name in the full report | Dallas | $750K–$1M | Paid preparer changed (990) | Vail & Park, P.C. | 68 | 42 | HIGH | Review filing | ||
| 12 | Name in the full report | Grand Prairie | $1M–$2M | First single audit | Bonadio & Co., LLP | 59 | 42 | HIGH | Review filing | ||
| 13 | Name in the full report | Houston | $2M–$5M | New significant deficiency | McConnell Jones LLP | 91 | 40 | HIGH | Add to watch | ||
| 14 | Name in the full report | Houston | $5M–$10M | Auditor changed | Whitley Penn, LLP | 87 | 40 | HIGH | Review filing | ||
| 15 | Name in the full report | Waxahachie | $5M–$10M | Paid preparer changed (990) | Scott, Singleton, Fincher & Co | 81 | 40 | HIGH | Review filing | ||
| 16 | Name in the full report | Dallas | $25M–$100M | Finance lead changed (990) | Armanino LLP | 81 | 40 | HIGH | Add to watch | ||
| 17 | Name in the full report | Fort Worth | $1M–$2M | Paid preparer changed (990) | SUTTON FROST CARY LLP | 66 | 40 | HIGH | Review filing | ||
| 18 | Name in the full report | Dallas | $5M–$10M | Auditor changed | CohnReznick LLP | 94 | 39 | HIGH | Review filing | ||
| 19 | Name in the full report | Aus | $2M–$5M | New significant deficiency | Sutton Frost Cary, LLP | 82 | 39 | HIGH | Add to watch | ||
| 20 | Name in the full report | San Antonio | $2M–$5M | Finance lead changed (990) | ADKF, PC | 79 | 39 | HIGH | Add to watch | ||
| 21 | Name in the full report | Houston | $2M–$5M | New material weakness | NORTON COLLAR LUND LILLY, PLLC | 71 | 39 | HIGH | Add to watch | ||
| 22 | Name in the full report | Dallas | $2M–$5M | Finance lead changed (990) | Sutton Frost Cary, LLP | 88 | 38 | HIGH | Add to watch | ||
| 23 | Name in the full report | Austin | $10M–$25M | Executive changed (990) | 742902112 | 81 | 38 | MEDIUM | Add to watch | ||
| 24 | Name in the full report | Smithville | $750K–$1M | First single audit | Martinez, Rosario & Company, LLP | 61 | 38 | HIGH | Review filing | ||
| 25 | Name in the full report | San Antonio | $25M–$100M | New material weakness | M Group, LLP | 94 | 37 | MEDIUM | Add to watch |
Next step follows the signal's tier, and is advice about your own desk rather than anything observed about the organization. Read RFP — an open solicitation. Review filing — a direct change on the latest filing. Add to watch — a complexity change. Diary FYE — a timing signal only.
Read this before the score. It names what was observed, when, and in which filing. Nothing in it is inferred beyond what the cited filing says, and none of it is a statement that an organization intends to change providers — that judgement is yours.
FAC audit year 2025 (report 2025-08-GSAFAC-0000424887) reports $1,422,392 in federal expenditures across 5 programs; the auditor firm on the 2025 report (Boring & Company, PC) differs from the prior observed year (Randy Silhan, CPA, CFE); the auditor firm on the 2024 report (Randy Silhan, CPA, CFE) differs from the prior observed year (WHITLEY PENN LLP); the paid preparer on the Form 990 for the period ending 2025-08 (Boring & Company PC) differs from the prior filing (RANDY SILHAN CPA CFE); a significant deficiency is disclosed for 2025 (none the prior year).
A different firm than last year; not a rename or a combination.
The paid preparer signing the latest Form 990 differs from the prior return's.
The first single audit filing observed for this organization.
The latest filing discloses a significant deficiency the prior one did not.
The latest filing discloses material noncompliance the prior one did not.
The finance lead named on the latest Form 990 differs from the prior return's.
The latest filing discloses a material weakness the prior one did not.
The officer named on the latest Form 990 differs from the prior return's.
Audit firms observed on nonprofit single audits in this territory over the two most recent audit years, largest practice first — and the size of work each one is winning.
| Audit firm | Nonprofit audits (2 years) | Median federal expenditures |
|---|---|---|
| SUTTON FROST CARY LLP | 76 | $2,018,138 |
| BLAZEK & VETTERLING | 54 | $2,611,590 |
| BKD, LLP | 48 | $8,869,634 |
| MADDOX & ASSOCIATES, APC | 42 | $1,424,095 |
| CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLP | 34 | $3,320,570 |
| RANDY WALKER & CO. | 31 | $1,580,672 |
| CARR, RIGGS & INGRAM, LLC | 28 | $5,584,496 |
| LAPORTE, APAC | 27 | $5,041,604 |
| PITTSFORD SAMUELS, PLLC | 27 | $3,067,640 |
| MONTEMAYOR BRITTON BENDER PC | 26 | $1,830,942 |
| 01_open_rfps.csv | Every solicitation open on the generation date, with its deadline quoted from the issuer's page and a link to that page. |
| 02_high_signal_accounts.csv | The ranked accounts, one row each, with the scores, the evidence sentence and the FAC report behind it. |
| 03_incumbent_landscape.csv | The audit firms observed in this territory, with how many nonprofit audits each one signed. |
| 04_program_context.csv | The federal programs behind each account, ten largest first. |
| 00_data_dictionary.csv | Every exported column, what it means, and the export's own metadata: sources, method version, date format, known limits. |
| auditradar_<ST>_<date>.xlsx | The same four tables in one workbook, formatted, with a data dictionary; its first sheet is the formatted first page of the data. |
| summary.pdf / summary.html | This summary, to read or to forward. |
| summary_dark.html | The same summary in the dark theme. |
| csv_data_report.pdf | The CSV files explained: the first rows, every column, how to read the signals and the outreach priority. |
| manifest.json | The FAC extract this build came from, by checksum, and the profile used. |
What this is: a ranked list of nonprofit audit/accounting pursuit opportunities built from public Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) data and publicly posted RFPs. Every row links to its FAC report (app.fac.gov/dissemination/summary/<report_id>) or to the original RFP page.
Sheets: 01_open_rfps = solicitations checked automatically against the issuer page on the date shown in last_verified_at. 02_high_signal_accounts = accounts ranked by Opportunity Signal, then ICP Fit, then Data Confidence. 03_incumbent_landscape = audit firms observed in FAC for this territory. 04_program_context = federal programs per account (top 10 by expenditure).
How to read the scores: ICP Fit (0-100) = how well the account matches a regional nonprofit audit practice (size, complexity, geography). Opportunity Signal (0-100) = inferred evidence of change: A direct change (auditor change, first single audit, entered threshold), B complexity change (federal spend growth, new findings), T timing (new or missing FAC filing). Open RFPs are explicit demand: they are listed first and in 01_open_rfps, never added into the score (primary_signal_tier S). Data Confidence = HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW based on identifier quality, recency and resubmission status.
What the words mean: "fac_fiscal_year_end" = the fiscal year end date on the latest FAC report; "fiscal year end approaching" means that date's next anniversary falls within 90 days of the data date, and "no FAC submission observed" means the Clearinghouse shows no report for the following fiscal year as of the data date — neither is a statement about an organization's filing status, nor that it is seeking proposals. "most recently observed auditor" = the auditor firm named on the latest FAC report; it is not a statement about a current contract. "Auditor changed" = the firm on a report differs from the firm on the report for the year before it, not counting a renamed or re-spelled firm or one that appears to have combined into another; the evidence sentence names the years. "Appears to have entered Single Audit-relevant level" = federal expenditures at/above the threshold applicable to that fiscal-year start ($750,000 before 2024-10-01; $1,000,000 on/after).
Coverage: blank cells with a coverage_flags entry mean the source did not report the value. We never display a missing value as $0. Form 990 columns (accounting fees, paid preparer, latest 990 tax period) come from the IRS Form 990 e-file data as filed; they are blank and flagged SOURCE_NOT_COVERED while a return has not been read yet, NOT_REQUIRED when the organization does not have to file a 990 with financial data, and NOT_APPLICABLE for a Form 990-EZ, which has no accounting-fee line. Form 990 accounting fees are not the price of an audit engagement: line 11c covers every accounting service bought that year - bookkeeping, the tax return, the audit - so read it as a ceiling on the audit fee rather than the fee (03_01 section 20.11). NTEE code, 501(c) subsection, revenue, assets and tax period come from the IRS Exempt Organizations Business Master File: they are the IRS's figures from the organization's latest return, not current financials.
Freshness: FAC public data is refreshed by GSA typically weekly. This report reflects the FAC extract identified in manifest.json (sha256 of general.csv). RFP status is as checked on the date in last_verified_at; deadlines can change — always confirm on the issuer's page.
The change shown on a headline card compares the two most recent complete audit years of Clearinghouse filings for this state, counted the same way in both, and names them on the card. A year counts as complete once its filing window has closed: nine months after the latest fiscal year end in it (2 CFR 200.512), plus ninety days for filings accepted after the due date. A year still being filed is not compared, because an unfinished year reads as a collapse. A card shows no change where there is no prior figure.
Not affiliated with the U.S. General Services Administration or the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. This report is sales-prioritization information, not legal, audit, or procurement advice, and makes no claim that any organization intends to change providers.
Public data.
Real opportunities.
Stronger communities.