Live preview · California

California nonprofit audit accounts — live public-data preview

A limited view of how AuditRadar organizes public Single Audit records and account changes for CPA-firm review.

Every supported row links to evidence. One organization is named so you can check the data against its own filing; the rest are in the file.

Open the California sample files Get the California report — $299

See the 15 accounts below

Data as of 2026-11-06 · Source: Federal Audit Clearinghouse (public data) · California · 15 of 3,360 accounts shown · Solicitations are checked against the issuer's own page on every crawl, at least weekly.

Updated weekly from the Federal Audit ClearinghouseLast pull Nov 15Newest filing in our data Nov 6Next pull Nov 22177 nonprofit single audits accepted Oct 26–Nov 1

3,360scored accounts in California
Up to 300ranked in your file, every name shown
15shown free on this page

2,054nonprofit audit accounts on record in Californiaaudit year 2025
93named a different audit firm than the prior year, not counting renamed or combined firmsaudit years 2024–2025
75crossed the single audit thresholdaudit year 2025
208 of 2,054reported at least one findingaudit year 2025

Source: Federal Audit Clearinghouse · Data as of 2026-11-06. Every number is a count of public filings, not an estimate.

How a row is built

From a public filing to a ranked account

FAC recordsEvery nonprofit Single Audit filed with the Clearinghouse
Year-over-year comparisonEach filing against the prior comparable one
Detected changeAuditor, first single audit, findings, threshold
Evidence linkThe filing the change was read from
Ranked territory reviewYour state, most worth reviewing first

The accounts

California accounts, ranked by opportunity signal

This preview is not a list of organizations looking for a new auditor. It is a sample of accounts with public-record changes worth reviewing. Open Why this row is here on any row for the observed fact, why it may merit review, what it does not mean, and the filing it came from.

The three numbers behind the order — opportunity signal, fit and the pursuit label — are explained on the method page.

Why these 15 accounts are on the list

Auditor changed9
Federal spend growth2
Paid preparer changed (990)2
New significant deficiency1
Executive changed (990)1

Ranked by opportunity signal, then fit
Organization	City	Federal expenditures	Most recently observed auditor	Signal	Pursue?	Source
SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE), INC.	CALABASAS	$2,253,483	O'CONNOR & COMPANY	Auditor changed 2025 Why this row is here Observed: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement. Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	HIGHLAND PARK	$1,504,686	Christy White Inc	Auditor changed 2024 Why this row is here Observed: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2024. Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement. Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	LOS ANGELES	$9,917,775	Dauby O'Connor & Zaleski, LLC	Federal spend growth 2025 Why this row is here Observed: Federal expenditures on the latest filing are at least 1.5 times the prior comparable filing, and the increase is at least $500,000. Figures are nominal, as reported. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: A larger federal program footprint usually means more major programs to audit. Does not mean: It does not mean the current engagement is at risk or that the audit fee has changed. Evidence: The expenditure totals on both filings, with the year each covers. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	SANTA FE SPRING	$1,658,486	Vasquez & Company LLP	New significant deficiency 2024 Why this row is here Observed: The latest filing reports a significant deficiency that was not reported in the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2024. Why it may merit review: It is a public, dated change in what the auditor reported about internal control. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization broke a rule, or that it is changing auditor. Evidence: The findings section of both filings on app.fac.gov. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	OAKLAND	$5,757,149	WithumSmith+Brown	Auditor changed 2024 Why this row is here Observed: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2024. Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement. Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	BERKELEY	$19,949,873	Baker Tilly US, LLP	Paid preparer changed (990) 2025	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	LOS ANGELES	$5,098,903	Armanino	Federal spend growth 2025 Why this row is here Observed: Federal expenditures on the latest filing are at least 1.5 times the prior comparable filing, and the increase is at least $500,000. Figures are nominal, as reported. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: A larger federal program footprint usually means more major programs to audit. Does not mean: It does not mean the current engagement is at risk or that the audit fee has changed. Evidence: The expenditure totals on both filings, with the year each covers. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	SANTA ROSA	$11,473,670	JGD & Associates	Auditor changed 2025 Why this row is here Observed: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement. Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	SACRAMENTO	$2,073,860	CliftonLarsonAllen	Auditor changed 2024 Why this row is here Observed: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2024. Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement. Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	OAKLAND	$2,988,010	SND PARTNERS LLP	Auditor changed 2024 Why this row is here Observed: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2024. Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement. Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	GUERNEVILLE	$1,305,175	Sorren CPAs, P.C.	Auditor changed 2025 Why this row is here Observed: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement. Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	SAN DIEGO	$801,545	Baker Tilly US, LLP	Auditor changed 2025 Why this row is here Observed: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement. Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗	Worth a review	FAC report
Name in the full report	ALAMEDA	$8,497,125	BPM	Executive changed (990) 2025	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	LONG BEACH	$7,216,024	CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLP	Auditor changed 2023 Why this row is here Observed: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2023. Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement. Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	UKIAH	$5,287,851	CliftonLarsonAllen LLP	Paid preparer changed (990) 2024	Strong fit	FAC report

The Thursday email

This is the email California subscribers get on Thursday

Built just now from this week's own California filings by the code that sends it — not a screenshot. It holds 10 accounts this week; 3 of them are printed here in full. Every account carries why it is on the list now, why it fits your practice, the filing it was read from and what to do next.

One email a week, on Thursday. Nothing else.
Ranked with your own practice profile, not a generic list.
Names the federal programs your firm already audits, on the accounts that share them.
Every account links to the public filing behind it.
Unsubscribe in one click, in every email.

AuditRadar · Thursday · to you

California: 10 account(s) to review, 0 verified RFP(s) — week of 2026-11-15

10Accounts to reviewRanked for your firm
0Verified RFPsOpen solicitations this week
4Account changesObserved on FAC filings

This week's accounts

Named in your emailLOS ANGELES, CA · Fit 95 of 100Strong fit
Why now
Federal spend growth · New material noncompliance · New material weakness on the FAC report accepted Nov 6, 2026 (audit year 2025).
Why you
ICP fit is 95 of 100 against the profile in use. The most recently observed auditor has appeared on 2 consecutive periods.
Evidence
The FAC report is linked in your email
Next
Latest FAC report: fiscal year ended Jun 30, 2025. The contact the organization filed with FAC is on the account page.
Named in your emailSTOCKTON, CA · Fit 94 of 100Strong fit
Why now
Repeat finding on the FAC report accepted Oct 27, 2026 (audit year 2025).
Why you
ICP fit is 94 of 100 against the profile in use. The most recently observed auditor has appeared on 10 consecutive periods.
Evidence
The FAC report is linked in your email
Next
Latest FAC report: fiscal year ended Jun 30, 2025. The contact the organization filed with FAC is on the account page.
Named in your emailCHICO, CA · Fit 92 of 100Strong fit
Why now
New material weakness on the FAC report accepted Nov 4, 2026 (audit year 2025).
Why you
ICP fit is 92 of 100 against the profile in use. The most recently observed auditor has appeared on 2 consecutive periods.
Evidence
The FAC report is linked in your email
Next
Latest FAC report: fiscal year ended Dec 31, 2025. The contact the organization filed with FAC is on the account page.

7 more accounts in this week's emailEach one with the same four lines, the organization named, and the filing it was read from.

Get this emailTerritory Watch sends the ranked California email every week, with every account named. $447 per 3 months ($149/mo).Start Territory Watch Compare plans

Built 2026-11-15 from Federal Audit Clearinghouse filings; FAC last synced 2026-11-06. Reports accepted since 2026-11-08 count as new this week. This example is ranked with the default profile; your own email is ranked with your firm’s. One organization may be named on this page; on every other row the name, the FAC report id and the evidence link are left on the server, not hidden in the page. We describe the public record and when it changed — never that an organization intends to change auditor, and never who audits it today.

Why it is safe to try

Four reasons the $299 is a low-risk test

7-day refundIf the Territory Report is not useful, email us within 7 days of delivery and we refund it in full, no questions asked.
One payment, no subscription$299 once for one state. Nothing renews.
Every row has its filingEach supported row links to the public filing it was read from, so you can check it.
Public records onlyClearinghouse filings, IRS Form 990 data and issuer-posted RFPs. No contact list is sold.