836
nonprofit audit accounts on record
Texas · audit years 2024–2025 · as of 2026-11-06 · Source: Federal Audit Clearinghouse
See which nonprofit audit accounts in your territory changed, and why each one is worth a look.
AuditRadar monitors public Single Audit records and public solicitations, detects meaningful account changes, and organizes them into a territory-level review workflow for CPA firms. Every signal is tied back to public evidence.
Last verified: 2026-10-01 · Public-record nonprofit audit intelligence for CPA firms.
Preview my state See the sample report
Updated weekly from the Federal Audit ClearinghouseLast pull Nov 15Newest filing in our data Nov 6Next pull Nov 22177 nonprofit single audits accepted Oct 26–Nov 1
No invented purchase intent. No hidden source. Your firm decides what is worth pursuing.
What changed in Texas?
49
named a different audit firm than the prior year, not counting renamed or combined firms
Texas · audit years 2024–2025 · as of 2026-11-06 · Source: Federal Audit Clearinghouse
22
crossed the single audit threshold
Texas · audit years 2024–2025 · as of 2026-11-06 · Source: Federal Audit Clearinghouse
112 of 836
reported at least one finding
Texas · audit years 2024–2025 · as of 2026-11-06 · Source: Federal Audit Clearinghouse
The research you are doing by hand
This is the sequence a partner or a BD lead repeats for every account worth a second look. Nothing in it is difficult; all of it is slow, and none of it is reusable next quarter.
- Think of an organization that might be worth approaching.
- Search for it on the Federal Audit Clearinghouse.
- Open its most recent single audit filing.
- Find the firm named as auditor on it.
- Open the prior year and find the firm named there.
- Compare the two, and read the findings section of both.
- Write the result down somewhere your team will find it.
- Start again with the next organization.
What the workflow looks like instead
- Choose a territory. One state, or a bundle of three.
- Review ranked accounts. Ordered by the change observed, then by how closely the account matches a regional nonprofit audit practice.
- Open the evidence. Every supported row links to the filing it was read from.
- See your own record beside theirs. Link your firm's name and each account lists its federal programs next to how many organizations with the same program FAC reports name you as the auditor of.
- Export or monitor what matters. Take the file to your CRM, with the auditee contact as filed in each account’s FAC report on its row, or keep the territory watched.
Example workflows — not customer testimonials
These are descriptions of how the product can be used. They are not case studies, and no client has been quoted: AuditRadar publishes a customer quote only where a signed consent document exists.
Building a practice in one state
Buy one Territory Report, read the ranked accounts, and decide whether nonprofit single audit work is worth pursuing before starting a subscription.
Replacing small engagements
Filter for accounts that crossed the federal threshold or grew their federal spend, which is where the larger single audit work sits.
Keeping a territory watched
Let the Thursday digest report what changed, instead of rebuilding the same search every quarter.
Mapping the incumbents
See which firms are observed on which filings across your states, and which accounts nobody in your comparison set is holding.
Why pay when the source is public?
The source is public. The comparison work is not done for you.
The Federal Audit Clearinghouse publishes every single audit. It does not tell you which accounts in your territory changed auditor, entered single audit for the first time, crossed the federal threshold or picked up a new finding — that comparison is manual, filing by filing, year against year.
Without AuditRadar
- Search for one organization
- Open its filing
- Locate the auditor named on it
- Compare it with the prior period
- Inspect the findings
- Record the result manually
- Repeat for the next account
With AuditRadar
- Choose your territory
- Review ranked accounts
- See why each account was flagged
- Open the source filing
- Export or watch the accounts that matter
Important
AuditRadar does not replace professional judgment. It organizes public evidence so your team can review it faster.
What we detect
Auditor changed
Observed: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing.
Why review it: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory.
Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement.
Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. How this is calculated
First single audit
Observed: A Single Audit filing appears for this organization for the first time in the comparison history AuditRadar holds.
Why review it: A first single audit usually means new federal funding and new compliance work.
Does not mean: “First observed” is not proof that no earlier audit exists outside the available records.
Evidence: The filing on app.fac.gov and the audit year it was accepted for. How this is calculated
Entered threshold
Observed: Federal expenditures moved from below to at or above the Single Audit threshold that applies to that fiscal year — $750,000 for a fiscal year beginning before October 1, 2024 and $1,000,000 for one beginning on or after it.
Why review it: The organization has entered Single Audit scope for the first time in the observed period.
Does not mean: It does not mean the organization missed a requirement, or that it is looking for a new firm.
Evidence: The expenditure total on each filing and the fiscal year each covers. How this is calculated
Federal spend growth
Observed: Federal expenditures on the latest filing are at least 1.5 times the prior comparable filing, and the increase is at least $500,000. Figures are nominal, as reported.
Why review it: A larger federal program footprint usually means more major programs to audit.
Does not mean: It does not mean the current engagement is at risk or that the audit fee has changed.
Evidence: The expenditure totals on both filings, with the year each covers. How this is calculated
New material weakness
Observed: The latest filing reports a material weakness that was not reported in the prior comparable filing.
Why review it: A new material weakness is a change in the control environment the next audit has to address.
Does not mean: It does not mean the audit was performed poorly, nor that the organization wants a different auditor.
Evidence: The findings section of both filings on app.fac.gov. How this is calculated
New significant deficiency
Observed: The latest filing reports a significant deficiency that was not reported in the prior comparable filing.
Why review it: It is a public, dated change in what the auditor reported about internal control.
Does not mean: It does not mean the organization broke a rule, or that it is changing auditor.
Evidence: The findings section of both filings on app.fac.gov. How this is calculated
New material noncompliance
Observed: The latest filing reports material noncompliance that was not reported in the prior comparable filing.
Why review it: Compliance findings add scope to the following year's single audit.
Does not mean: It does not mean an enforcement action exists, or that the organization is procuring audit services.
Evidence: The findings section of both filings on app.fac.gov. How this is calculated
What the product actually looks like
One row per organization, ordered by a signal you can open and argue with.
Every audit year held, the firm named on each report, the expenditures, the programs and the findings.
One state, up to 300 accounts ranked by public-record change, with a link to the filing behind every row.
Download the sample files — a redacted build of the real Texas report, built from the 2026-11-06 extract: XLSX · PDF · CSV · HTML. Only the first row is named; below it the organization name, EIN, FAC link and report id are blank and dollars are banded. The columns, scores and signals are the production ones.
Open the full product tour, read how accounts are ranked, or check how fresh each source is.
Who this is for
- Firms building a nonprofit audit practice in one state.
- Firms replacing small engagements with larger single audit work.
- Partners who already research FAC by hand.
- Marketing or BD staff who need the research organized.
Choose the amount of research you want organized
Territory Report
Give me one complete state to review now.
Who should I review now?
$299 one-time
Best first purchase if you want to evaluate the full territory output before subscribing.
Territory Watch
Keep my territory monitored instead of rebuilding the research manually.
Tell me when my territory changes.
$447 per 3 months ($149/mo)
For firms that want the same territory monitored instead of periodically rebuilding the research.
Pro
Maintain an active multi-territory pursuit list.
Help me pursue the opportunities that match my firm.
$249/mo
For active business-development workflows spanning two territory bundles.
Firm
Map multiple states, incumbents and whitespace as a team.
Map our market, the incumbents and the whitespace.
$449/mo
For teams that need broader territory coverage and the Firm-only analysis and export capabilities.
- 7-day refund after delivery on the Territory Report
- Subscriptions cancel anytime
- Every supported row links to its public source
- A live preview and a redacted sample before you pay
What AuditRadar is, and what it is not
What AuditRadar is
- A territory view of public Single Audit records.
- A change detector across audit years.
- A ranked review queue with the evidence attached.
- A monitor for public audit solicitations.
- A workflow your firm can act on.
What AuditRadar is not
- A list of organizations that want a new auditor.
- A prediction of who will change auditor.
- A lead list with purchase intent.
- A replacement for professional judgment.
- A source of private or non-public information.
Evidence, not invented intent. AuditRadar shows observable public-record changes and the source behind them. Your firm decides which accounts are worth pursuing.
What AuditRadar is, and what it is not
What it is
- A territory view of public Single Audit records.
- A change detector across audit years.
- A ranked review queue with the evidence attached.
- A monitor for public audit solicitations.
- A workflow your firm can act on.
What it is not
- A list of organizations that want a new auditor.
- A prediction of who will change auditor.
- A lead list with purchase intent.
- A replacement for professional judgment.
- A source of private or non-public information.
Questions CPA firms ask first
Why pay when FAC data is public?
The Federal Audit Clearinghouse publishes every single audit. It does not tell you which accounts in your territory changed auditor, entered single audit for the first time, crossed the federal threshold or picked up a new finding — that comparison is manual, filing by filing, year against year. AuditRadar does not replace professional judgment. It organizes public evidence so your team can review it faster.
What exactly is in the Territory Report?
One state, ranked by public-record change: up to 300 accounts, the signal behind each one, the most recently observed auditor, federal expenditure context, the incumbent landscape, verified open RFPs when an issuer has published one, and a link to the filing behind every supported row. It arrives as XLSX, CSV, PDF and HTML, plus a data dictionary that defines every column, and for 30 days after you pay your download link serves the newest weekly build.
Does AuditRadar include contact details?
Yes, where a public filing carries one. AuditRadar shows the contacts that public filings already carry, never a list for sale. On Territory Watch, Pro and Firm, an organization page shows the auditee contact as filed in the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (FAC) report it cites (contact title, phone, email, and the certifying official’s name and title), whether that email and phone were found on the organization’s own website and when we looked, and the officers listed on its IRS Form 990 (names and titles). The Territory Report files and the signed-in CSV export carry the auditee contact as filed in the FAC report (title, phone, email) on each account row. An open RFP shows the contact its issuer prints on the RFP page. A filed contact is shown as filed: we do not correct or update it, and we do not sell contact lists. Public pages, samples, previews, the weekly digest and free accounts show no contact.
Does an auditor change mean the nonprofit wants a new auditor?
No. An auditor change means the most recently observed filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement. AuditRadar shows observable public-record changes and the source behind them; your firm decides which accounts are worth pursuing.
Start where the evidence is: open a live state preview or compare the four plans.