Live preview · Maine

Maine nonprofit audit accounts — live public-data preview

A limited view of how AuditRadar organizes public Single Audit records and account changes for CPA-firm review.

Every supported row links to evidence. One organization is named so you can check the data against its own filing; the rest are in the file.

Open the Maine sample files Get the Maine report — $299

See the 15 accounts below

Data as of 2026-11-06 · Source: Federal Audit Clearinghouse (public data) · Maine · 15 of 340 accounts shown · Solicitations are checked against the issuer's own page on every crawl, at least weekly.

Updated weekly from the Federal Audit ClearinghouseLast pull Nov 15Newest filing in our data Nov 6Next pull Nov 22177 nonprofit single audits accepted Oct 26–Nov 1

  • 340scored accounts in Maine
  • Up to 300ranked in your file, every name shown
  • 15shown free on this page

Source: Federal Audit Clearinghouse · Data as of 2026-11-06. Every number is a count of public filings, not an estimate.

How a row is built

From a public filing to a ranked account

  1. FAC recordsEvery nonprofit Single Audit filed with the Clearinghouse
  2. Year-over-year comparisonEach filing against the prior comparable one
  3. Detected changeAuditor, first single audit, findings, threshold
  4. Evidence linkThe filing the change was read from
  5. Ranked territory reviewYour state, most worth reviewing first

The accounts

Maine accounts, ranked by opportunity signal

This preview is not a list of organizations looking for a new auditor. It is a sample of accounts with public-record changes worth reviewing. Open Why this row is here on any row for the observed fact, why it may merit review, what it does not mean, and the filing it came from.

The three numbers behind the order — opportunity signal, fit and the pursuit label — are explained on the method page.

Why these 15 accounts are on the list

  • Auditor changed3
  • Paid preparer changed (990)3
  • First single audit3
  • Executive changed (990)1
  • New material noncompliance1
  • Federal spend growth1
  • New material weakness1
  • New significant deficiency1
  • Finance lead changed (990)1
Ranked by opportunity signal, then fit
OrganizationCityFederal expendituresMost recently observed auditorSignalPursue?Source
HARRINGTON FAMILY HEALTH CENTERHARRINGTON$1,596,995BDMP ASSURANCE, LLPExecutive changed (990) 2025Strong fitFAC report
Name in the full reportPORTLAND$60,800,127BDMP Assurance, LLPAuditor changed 2025
Why this row is here

Observed: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025.

Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory.

Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement.

Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗

Strong fitFAC report
Name in the full reportWATERVILLE$1,308,002WIPFLI LLPPaid preparer changed (990) 2025Strong fitFAC report
Name in the full reportBANGOR$812,213WIPFLI LLPAuditor changed 2024
Why this row is here

Observed: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2024.

Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory.

Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement.

Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗

Worth a reviewFAC report
Name in the full reportSOUTH PARIS$1,150,092WIPFLI LLPPaid preparer changed (990) 2025Strong fitFAC report
Name in the full reportPORTLAND$1,170,378WIPFLI LLPFirst single audit 2025
Why this row is here

Observed: A Single Audit filing appears for this organization for the first time in the comparison history AuditRadar holds. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025.

Why it may merit review: A first single audit usually means new federal funding and new compliance work.

Does not mean: “First observed” is not proof that no earlier audit exists outside the available records.

Evidence: The filing on app.fac.gov and the audit year it was accepted for. Open the filing ↗

Strong fitFAC report
Name in the full reportHALLOWELL$880,919Purdy Powers & CompanyFirst single audit 2025
Why this row is here

Observed: A Single Audit filing appears for this organization for the first time in the comparison history AuditRadar holds. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025.

Why it may merit review: A first single audit usually means new federal funding and new compliance work.

Does not mean: “First observed” is not proof that no earlier audit exists outside the available records.

Evidence: The filing on app.fac.gov and the audit year it was accepted for. Open the filing ↗

Worth a reviewFAC report
Name in the full reportBATH$5,382,702One River CPAsNew material noncompliance 2025
Why this row is here

Observed: The latest filing reports material noncompliance that was not reported in the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025.

Why it may merit review: Compliance findings add scope to the following year's single audit.

Does not mean: It does not mean an enforcement action exists, or that the organization is procuring audit services.

Evidence: The findings section of both filings on app.fac.gov. Open the filing ↗

Strong fitFAC report
Name in the full reportMILLINOCKET$10,461,714BDMP Assurance, LLPFederal spend growth 2025
Why this row is here

Observed: Federal expenditures on the latest filing are at least 1.5 times the prior comparable filing, and the increase is at least $500,000. Figures are nominal, as reported. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025.

Why it may merit review: A larger federal program footprint usually means more major programs to audit.

Does not mean: It does not mean the current engagement is at risk or that the audit fee has changed.

Evidence: The expenditure totals on both filings, with the year each covers. Open the filing ↗

Strong fitFAC report
Name in the full reportPORTLAND$1,384,111Purdy Powers & Co.New material weakness 2024
Why this row is here

Observed: The latest filing reports a material weakness that was not reported in the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2024.

Why it may merit review: A new material weakness is a change in the control environment the next audit has to address.

Does not mean: It does not mean the audit was performed poorly, nor that the organization wants a different auditor.

Evidence: The findings section of both filings on app.fac.gov. Open the filing ↗

Strong fitFAC report
Name in the full reportHOULTON$3,210,776RHR Smith & CompanyAuditor changed 2025
Why this row is here

Observed: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025.

Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory.

Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement.

Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗

Strong fitFAC report
Name in the full reportBANGOR$4,906,573BDMP Assurance LLPNew significant deficiency 2025
Why this row is here

Observed: The latest filing reports a significant deficiency that was not reported in the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025.

Why it may merit review: It is a public, dated change in what the auditor reported about internal control.

Does not mean: It does not mean the organization broke a rule, or that it is changing auditor.

Evidence: The findings section of both filings on app.fac.gov. Open the filing ↗

Strong fitFAC report
Name in the full reportBANGOR$10,684,167WIPFLI LLPPaid preparer changed (990) 2024Strong fitFAC report
Name in the full reportKEENE$1,291,544BDMP Assurance, LLPFinance lead changed (990) 2025Strong fitFAC report
Name in the full reportBRUNSWICK$1,676,288Purdy Powers & Co.First single audit 2025
Why this row is here

Observed: A Single Audit filing appears for this organization for the first time in the comparison history AuditRadar holds. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025.

Why it may merit review: A first single audit usually means new federal funding and new compliance work.

Does not mean: “First observed” is not proof that no earlier audit exists outside the available records.

Evidence: The filing on app.fac.gov and the audit year it was accepted for. Open the filing ↗

Worth a reviewFAC report

The Thursday email

This is the email Maine subscribers get on Thursday

Built just now from this week's own Maine filings by the code that sends it — not a screenshot. It holds 10 accounts this week; 3 of them are printed here in full. Every account carries why it is on the list now, why it fits your practice, the filing it was read from and what to do next.

  • One email a week, on Thursday. Nothing else.
  • Ranked with your own practice profile, not a generic list.
  • Names the federal programs your firm already audits, on the accounts that share them.
  • Every account links to the public filing behind it.
  • Unsubscribe in one click, in every email.

AuditRadar · Thursday · to you

Maine: 10 account(s) to review, 0 verified RFP(s) — week of 2026-11-14

  • 10Accounts to reviewRanked for your firm
  • 0Verified RFPsOpen solicitations this week
  • 0Account changesObserved on FAC filings

This week's accounts

  1. Named in your emailBATH, ME · Fit 94 of 100Strong fit
    Why now
    Repeat finding on the FAC report accepted Oct 28, 2026 (audit year 2025).
    Why you
    ICP fit is 94 of 100 against the profile in use. The most recently observed auditor has appeared on 6 consecutive periods.
    Evidence
    The FAC report is linked in your email
    Next
    Latest FAC report: fiscal year ended Sep 30, 2025. The contact the organization filed with FAC is on the account page.
  2. Named in your emailPORTLAND, ME · Fit 89 of 100Year end soon
    Why now
    Next fiscal year end Dec 31, 2026; the same audit firm is named on 6 consecutive FAC reports.
    Why you
    ICP fit is 89 of 100 against the profile in use.
    Evidence
    The FAC report is linked in your email
    Next
    Latest FAC report: fiscal year ended Dec 31, 2025. The contact the organization filed with FAC is on the account page.
  3. Named in your emailLINCOLN, ME · Fit 84 of 100Year end soon
    Why now
    Next fiscal year end Dec 31, 2026; the same audit firm is named on 10 consecutive FAC reports.
    Why you
    ICP fit is 84 of 100 against the profile in use.
    Evidence
    The FAC report is linked in your email
    Next
    Latest FAC report: fiscal year ended Dec 31, 2025. The contact the organization filed with FAC is on the account page.
7 more accounts in this week's emailEach one with the same four lines, the organization named, and the filing it was read from.
Get a free letter firstThree Maine signals every Thursday, no card.
Get this emailTerritory Watch sends the ranked Maine email every week, with every account named. $447 per 3 months ($149/mo).Start Territory WatchCompare plans

Built 2026-11-14 from Federal Audit Clearinghouse filings; FAC last synced 2026-11-06. Reports accepted since 2026-11-07 count as new this week. This example is ranked with the default profile; your own email is ranked with your firm’s. One organization may be named on this page; on every other row the name, the FAC report id and the evidence link are left on the server, not hidden in the page. We describe the public record and when it changed — never that an organization intends to change auditor, and never who audits it today.

Why it is safe to try

Four reasons the $299 is a low-risk test

Want a weekly nudge instead?

Get the 3 newest audit signals in Maine next Thursday — free.

One email a week. Unsubscribe in one click.

We describe the public record and when it changed. We never state that an organization intends to change providers, that an engagement is ending, or who audits an organization today.