Live preview · Michigan

Michigan nonprofit audit accounts — live public-data preview

A limited view of how AuditRadar organizes public Single Audit records and account changes for CPA-firm review.

Every supported row links to evidence. One organization is named so you can check the data against its own filing; the rest are in the file.

Open the Michigan sample files Get the Michigan report — $299

See the 15 accounts below

Data as of 2026-11-06 · Source: Federal Audit Clearinghouse (public data) · Michigan · 15 of 983 accounts shown · Solicitations are checked against the issuer's own page on every crawl, at least weekly.

Updated weekly from the Federal Audit ClearinghouseLast pull Nov 15Newest filing in our data Nov 6Next pull Nov 22177 nonprofit single audits accepted Oct 26–Nov 1

983scored accounts in Michigan
Up to 300ranked in your file, every name shown
15shown free on this page

579nonprofit audit accounts on record in Michiganaudit year 2025
30named a different audit firm than the prior year, not counting renamed or combined firmsaudit years 2024–2025
25crossed the single audit thresholdaudit year 2025
76 of 579reported at least one findingaudit year 2025

Source: Federal Audit Clearinghouse · Data as of 2026-11-06. Every number is a count of public filings, not an estimate.

How a row is built

From a public filing to a ranked account

FAC recordsEvery nonprofit Single Audit filed with the Clearinghouse
Year-over-year comparisonEach filing against the prior comparable one
Detected changeAuditor, first single audit, findings, threshold
Evidence linkThe filing the change was read from
Ranked territory reviewYour state, most worth reviewing first

The accounts

Michigan accounts, ranked by opportunity signal

This preview is not a list of organizations looking for a new auditor. It is a sample of accounts with public-record changes worth reviewing. Open Why this row is here on any row for the observed fact, why it may merit review, what it does not mean, and the filing it came from.

The three numbers behind the order — opportunity signal, fit and the pursuit label — are explained on the method page.

Why these 15 accounts are on the list

Auditor changed3
First single audit3
New significant deficiency2
New material weakness2
New material noncompliance2
Federal spend growth1
Accounting fees jumped (990)1
Executive changed (990)1

Ranked by opportunity signal, then fit
Organization	City	Federal expenditures	Most recently observed auditor	Signal	Pursue?	Source
Wayne State University Research and Technology Park in the City of Detroit and Subsidiaries	DETROIT	$4,653,060	Baker Tilly US, LLP	Federal spend growth 2025 Why this row is here Observed: Federal expenditures on the latest filing are at least 1.5 times the prior comparable filing, and the increase is at least $500,000. Figures are nominal, as reported. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: A larger federal program footprint usually means more major programs to audit. Does not mean: It does not mean the current engagement is at risk or that the audit fee has changed. Evidence: The expenditure totals on both filings, with the year each covers. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	DETROIT	$4,739,492	CapinCrouse LLC	Auditor changed 2025 Why this row is here Observed: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement. Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	GRAND RAPIDS	$2,676,833	Doeren Mayhew Assurance	New significant deficiency 2025 Why this row is here Observed: The latest filing reports a significant deficiency that was not reported in the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: It is a public, dated change in what the auditor reported about internal control. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization broke a rule, or that it is changing auditor. Evidence: The findings section of both filings on app.fac.gov. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	LANSING	$4,983,128	Hungerford	Auditor changed 2025 Why this row is here Observed: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement. Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	DETROIT	$2,270,330	ALAN C. YOUNG & ASSOCIATES, P.C.	New material weakness 2025 Why this row is here Observed: The latest filing reports a material weakness that was not reported in the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: A new material weakness is a change in the control environment the next audit has to address. Does not mean: It does not mean the audit was performed poorly, nor that the organization wants a different auditor. Evidence: The findings section of both filings on app.fac.gov. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	DETROIT	$5,788,420	ALAN C YOUNG & ASSOCIATES, P.C.	New material noncompliance 2024 Why this row is here Observed: The latest filing reports material noncompliance that was not reported in the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2024. Why it may merit review: Compliance findings add scope to the following year's single audit. Does not mean: It does not mean an enforcement action exists, or that the organization is procuring audit services. Evidence: The findings section of both filings on app.fac.gov. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	MUNISING	$7,661,112	Eide Bailly LLP	Auditor changed 2025 Why this row is here Observed: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement. Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	DETROIT	$2,323,671	Baker Tilly US, LLP	New material weakness 2025 Why this row is here Observed: The latest filing reports a material weakness that was not reported in the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: A new material weakness is a change in the control environment the next audit has to address. Does not mean: It does not mean the audit was performed poorly, nor that the organization wants a different auditor. Evidence: The findings section of both filings on app.fac.gov. Open the filing ↗	Worth a review	FAC report
Name in the full report	L ANSE	$1,549,043	CliftonLarsonAllen LLP	First single audit 2025 Why this row is here Observed: A Single Audit filing appears for this organization for the first time in the comparison history AuditRadar holds. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: A first single audit usually means new federal funding and new compliance work. Does not mean: “First observed” is not proof that no earlier audit exists outside the available records. Evidence: The filing on app.fac.gov and the audit year it was accepted for. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	DETROIT	$5,941,493	Yeo & Yeo CPAs & Advisors	Accounting fees jumped (990) 2025	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	HANCOCK	$4,211,789	Yeo & Yeo, P.C.	Executive changed (990) 2025	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	GRAND RAPIDS	$1,548,215	Vredeveld Haefner LLC	First single audit 2025 Why this row is here Observed: A Single Audit filing appears for this organization for the first time in the comparison history AuditRadar holds. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: A first single audit usually means new federal funding and new compliance work. Does not mean: “First observed” is not proof that no earlier audit exists outside the available records. Evidence: The filing on app.fac.gov and the audit year it was accepted for. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	DETROIT	$6,534,215	Doeren Mayhew Assurance	New material noncompliance 2024 Why this row is here Observed: The latest filing reports material noncompliance that was not reported in the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2024. Why it may merit review: Compliance findings add scope to the following year's single audit. Does not mean: It does not mean an enforcement action exists, or that the organization is procuring audit services. Evidence: The findings section of both filings on app.fac.gov. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	TOLEDO	$2,957,180	Maner Costerisan	New significant deficiency 2024 Why this row is here Observed: The latest filing reports a significant deficiency that was not reported in the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2024. Why it may merit review: It is a public, dated change in what the auditor reported about internal control. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization broke a rule, or that it is changing auditor. Evidence: The findings section of both filings on app.fac.gov. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	ANN ARBOR	$1,020,199	CBIZ CPAs P.C.	First single audit 2024 Why this row is here Observed: A Single Audit filing appears for this organization for the first time in the comparison history AuditRadar holds. The latest filing held here is audit year 2024. Why it may merit review: A first single audit usually means new federal funding and new compliance work. Does not mean: “First observed” is not proof that no earlier audit exists outside the available records. Evidence: The filing on app.fac.gov and the audit year it was accepted for. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report

The Thursday email

This is the email Michigan subscribers get on Thursday

Built just now from this week's own Michigan filings by the code that sends it — not a screenshot. It holds 10 accounts this week; 3 of them are printed here in full. Every account carries why it is on the list now, why it fits your practice, the filing it was read from and what to do next.

One email a week, on Thursday. Nothing else.
Ranked with your own practice profile, not a generic list.
Names the federal programs your firm already audits, on the accounts that share them.
Every account links to the public filing behind it.
Unsubscribe in one click, in every email.

AuditRadar · Thursday · to you

Michigan: 10 account(s) to review, 1 verified RFP(s) — week of 2026-11-15

10Accounts to reviewRanked for your firm
1Verified RFPOpen solicitations this week
0Account changesObserved on FAC filings

This week's accounts

Named in your emailDETROIT, MI · Fit 100 of 100Strong fit
Why now
Repeat finding on the FAC report accepted Nov 2, 2026 (audit year 2024).
Why you
ICP fit is 100 of 100 against the profile in use. The most recently observed auditor has appeared on 3 consecutive periods.
Evidence
The FAC report is linked in your email
Next
Latest FAC report: fiscal year ended Sep 30, 2024. The contact the organization filed with FAC is on the account page.
Named in your emailGRAND RAPIDS, MI · Fit 87 of 100Strong fit
Why now
Repeat finding on the FAC report accepted Nov 3, 2026 (audit year 2025).
Why you
ICP fit is 87 of 100 against the profile in use. The most recently observed auditor has appeared on 5 consecutive periods.
Evidence
The FAC report is linked in your email
Next
Latest FAC report: fiscal year ended Dec 31, 2025. The contact the organization filed with FAC is on the account page.
Named in your emailDETROIT, MI · Fit 82 of 100Strong fit
Why now
Repeat finding on the FAC report accepted Nov 4, 2026 (audit year 2024).
Why you
ICP fit is 82 of 100 against the profile in use. The most recently observed auditor has appeared on 2 consecutive periods.
Evidence
The FAC report is linked in your email
Next
Latest FAC report: fiscal year ended Dec 31, 2024. The contact the organization filed with FAC is on the account page.

7 more accounts in this week's emailEach one with the same four lines, the organization named, and the filing it was read from.

Get this emailTerritory Watch sends the ranked Michigan email every week, with every account named. $447 per 3 months ($149/mo).Start Territory Watch Compare plans

Built 2026-11-15 from Federal Audit Clearinghouse filings; FAC last synced 2026-11-06. Reports accepted since 2026-11-08 count as new this week. This example is ranked with the default profile; your own email is ranked with your firm’s. One organization may be named on this page; on every other row the name, the FAC report id and the evidence link are left on the server, not hidden in the page. We describe the public record and when it changed — never that an organization intends to change auditor, and never who audits it today.

Why it is safe to try

Four reasons the $299 is a low-risk test

7-day refundIf the Territory Report is not useful, email us within 7 days of delivery and we refund it in full, no questions asked.
One payment, no subscription$299 once for one state. Nothing renews.
Every row has its filingEach supported row links to the public filing it was read from, so you can check it.
Public records onlyClearinghouse filings, IRS Form 990 data and issuer-posted RFPs. No contact list is sold.