Live preview · Mississippi
Mississippi nonprofit audit accounts — live public-data preview
A limited view of how AuditRadar organizes public Single Audit records and account changes for CPA-firm review.
Every supported row links to evidence. One organization is named so you can check the data against its own filing; the rest are in the file.
Open the Mississippi sample files Get the Mississippi report — $299
Data as of 2026-11-06 · Source: Federal Audit Clearinghouse (public data) · Mississippi · 15 of 401 accounts shown · Solicitations are checked against the issuer's own page on every crawl, at least weekly.
Updated weekly from the Federal Audit ClearinghouseLast pull Nov 15Newest filing in our data Nov 6Next pull Nov 22177 nonprofit single audits accepted Oct 26–Nov 1
- 401scored accounts in Mississippi
- Up to 300ranked in your file, every name shown
- 15shown free on this page
- 207nonprofit audit accounts on record in Mississippiaudit year 2025
- 8named a different audit firm than the prior year, not counting renamed or combined firmsaudit years 2024–2025
- 37crossed the single audit thresholdaudit year 2025
- 17 of 207reported at least one findingaudit year 2025
Source: Federal Audit Clearinghouse · Data as of 2026-11-06. Every number is a count of public filings, not an estimate.
How a row is built
From a public filing to a ranked account
- FAC recordsEvery nonprofit Single Audit filed with the Clearinghouse
- Year-over-year comparisonEach filing against the prior comparable one
- Detected changeAuditor, first single audit, findings, threshold
- Evidence linkThe filing the change was read from
- Ranked territory reviewYour state, most worth reviewing first
The accounts
Mississippi accounts, ranked by opportunity signal
This preview is not a list of organizations looking for a new auditor. It is a sample of accounts with public-record changes worth reviewing. Open Why this row is here on any row for the observed fact, why it may merit review, what it does not mean, and the filing it came from.
The three numbers behind the order — opportunity signal, fit and the pursuit label — are explained on the method page.
Why these 15 accounts are on the list
- Auditor changed5
- First single audit5
- New significant deficiency3
- Executive changed (990)1
- Federal spend growth1
| Organization | City | Federal expenditures | Most recently observed auditor | Signal | Pursue? | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF GREENWOOD, MISSISSIPPI | GREENWOOD | $2,986,325 | JOHN RUSSELL AND ASSOCIATES INC. | Auditor changed 2025Why this row is hereObserved: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement. Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗ | Strong fit | FAC report |
| Name in the full report | RIDGELAND | $2,186,255 | THE WESLEY PEACHTREE GROUP CPA'S | Auditor changed 2024Why this row is hereObserved: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2024. Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement. Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗ | Strong fit | FAC report |
| Name in the full report | TYLERTOWN | $1,186,318 | Griffin & Furman, LLC | Auditor changed 2025Why this row is hereObserved: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement. Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗ | Strong fit | FAC report |
| Name in the full report | BROOKHAVEN | $2,227,058 | FORVIS MAZARS, LLP | Executive changed (990) 2024 | Worth a review | FAC report |
| Name in the full report | COLUMBIA | $1,186,010 | Griffin & Furman, LLC | Auditor changed 2025Why this row is hereObserved: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement. Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗ | Strong fit | FAC report |
| Name in the full report | MCCOMB | $1,118,263 | LOWERY PAYN LEGGETT & BELLIPANNI CPAS | New significant deficiency 2025Why this row is hereObserved: The latest filing reports a significant deficiency that was not reported in the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: It is a public, dated change in what the auditor reported about internal control. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization broke a rule, or that it is changing auditor. Evidence: The findings section of both filings on app.fac.gov. Open the filing ↗ | Worth a review | FAC report |
| Name in the full report | HATTIESBURG | $1,977,776 | GranthamPoole PLLC | New significant deficiency 2024Why this row is hereObserved: The latest filing reports a significant deficiency that was not reported in the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2024. Why it may merit review: It is a public, dated change in what the auditor reported about internal control. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization broke a rule, or that it is changing auditor. Evidence: The findings section of both filings on app.fac.gov. Open the filing ↗ | Strong fit | FAC report |
| Name in the full report | GLUCKSTADT | $2,216,104 | BDO | First single audit 2025Why this row is hereObserved: A Single Audit filing appears for this organization for the first time in the comparison history AuditRadar holds. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: A first single audit usually means new federal funding and new compliance work. Does not mean: “First observed” is not proof that no earlier audit exists outside the available records. Evidence: The filing on app.fac.gov and the audit year it was accepted for. Open the filing ↗ | Strong fit | FAC report |
| Name in the full report | GLOSTER | $1,167,253 | Matthews Curtrer & Lindsay, P.A. | First single audit 2025Why this row is hereObserved: A Single Audit filing appears for this organization for the first time in the comparison history AuditRadar holds. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: A first single audit usually means new federal funding and new compliance work. Does not mean: “First observed” is not proof that no earlier audit exists outside the available records. Evidence: The filing on app.fac.gov and the audit year it was accepted for. Open the filing ↗ | Worth a review | FAC report |
| Name in the full report | JACKSON | $95,256,480 | Forvis Mazars LLP | First single audit 2025Why this row is hereObserved: A Single Audit filing appears for this organization for the first time in the comparison history AuditRadar holds. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: A first single audit usually means new federal funding and new compliance work. Does not mean: “First observed” is not proof that no earlier audit exists outside the available records. Evidence: The filing on app.fac.gov and the audit year it was accepted for. Open the filing ↗ | Worth a review | FAC report |
| Name in the full report | CLARKSDALE | $3,695,372 | EisnerAmper | Auditor changed 2025Why this row is hereObserved: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement. Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗ | Strong fit | FAC report |
| Name in the full report | PELAHATCHIE | $2,175,074 | Windham and Lacey, PLLC | First single audit 2025Why this row is hereObserved: A Single Audit filing appears for this organization for the first time in the comparison history AuditRadar holds. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: A first single audit usually means new federal funding and new compliance work. Does not mean: “First observed” is not proof that no earlier audit exists outside the available records. Evidence: The filing on app.fac.gov and the audit year it was accepted for. Open the filing ↗ | Worth a review | FAC report |
| Name in the full report | CARTHAGE | $1,850,626 | Dribben & Associates CPAs PLLC | First single audit 2025Why this row is hereObserved: A Single Audit filing appears for this organization for the first time in the comparison history AuditRadar holds. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: A first single audit usually means new federal funding and new compliance work. Does not mean: “First observed” is not proof that no earlier audit exists outside the available records. Evidence: The filing on app.fac.gov and the audit year it was accepted for. Open the filing ↗ | Worth a review | FAC report |
| Name in the full report | RAYMOND | $10,740,904 | Matthews Curtrer & Lindsay, P.A. | Federal spend growth 2025Why this row is hereObserved: Federal expenditures on the latest filing are at least 1.5 times the prior comparable filing, and the increase is at least $500,000. Figures are nominal, as reported. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: A larger federal program footprint usually means more major programs to audit. Does not mean: It does not mean the current engagement is at risk or that the audit fee has changed. Evidence: The expenditure totals on both filings, with the year each covers. Open the filing ↗ | Strong fit | FAC report |
| Name in the full report | ASHLAND | $1,804,055 | FRANKS, FRANKS, WILEMON & HAGOOD, P.A. | New significant deficiency 2024Why this row is hereObserved: The latest filing reports a significant deficiency that was not reported in the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2024. Why it may merit review: It is a public, dated change in what the auditor reported about internal control. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization broke a rule, or that it is changing auditor. Evidence: The findings section of both filings on app.fac.gov. Open the filing ↗ | Strong fit | FAC report |
The Thursday email
This is the email Mississippi subscribers get on Thursday
Built just now from this week's own Mississippi filings by the code that sends it — not a screenshot. It holds 10 accounts this week; 3 of them are printed here in full. Every account carries why it is on the list now, why it fits your practice, the filing it was read from and what to do next.
- One email a week, on Thursday. Nothing else.
- Ranked with your own practice profile, not a generic list.
- Names the federal programs your firm already audits, on the accounts that share them.
- Every account links to the public filing behind it.
- Unsubscribe in one click, in every email.
AuditRadar · Thursday · to you
Mississippi: 10 account(s) to review, 0 verified RFP(s) — week of 2026-11-13
- 10Accounts to reviewRanked for your firm
- 0Verified RFPsOpen solicitations this week
- 2Account changesObserved on FAC filings
This week's accounts
- Named in your emailASHLAND, MS · Fit 73 of 100Strong fit
- Why now
- New significant deficiency on the FAC report accepted Nov 5, 2026 (audit year 2024).
- Why you
- ICP fit is 73 of 100 against the profile in use. The most recently observed auditor has appeared on 2 consecutive periods.
- Evidence
- The FAC report is linked in your email
- Next
- Latest FAC report: fiscal year ended Dec 31, 2024. The contact the organization filed with FAC is on the account page.
- Named in your emailVALLEY PARK, MS · Fit 68 of 100Strong fit
- Why now
- First single audit · Entered threshold on the FAC report accepted Nov 2, 2026 (audit year 2026).
- Why you
- ICP fit is 68 of 100 against the profile in use. Federal awards expended on the latest report: $1,522,754.
- Evidence
- The FAC report is linked in your email
- Next
- Latest FAC report: fiscal year ended Jun 30, 2026. The contact the organization filed with FAC is on the account page.
- Named in your emailLEXINGTON, MS · Fit 56 of 100Worth a review
- Why now
- First single audit · Entered threshold on the FAC report accepted Nov 2, 2026 (audit year 2025).
- Why you
- ICP fit is 56 of 100 against the profile in use. Federal awards expended on the latest report: $1,467,339. The fit is mid-range, so this is worth reading before you act.
- Evidence
- The FAC report is linked in your email
- Next
- Latest FAC report: fiscal year ended Dec 31, 2025. The contact the organization filed with FAC is on the account page.
Built 2026-11-13 from Federal Audit Clearinghouse filings; FAC last synced 2026-11-06. Reports accepted since 2026-11-06 count as new this week. This example is ranked with the default profile; your own email is ranked with your firm’s. One organization may be named on this page; on every other row the name, the FAC report id and the evidence link are left on the server, not hidden in the page. We describe the public record and when it changed — never that an organization intends to change auditor, and never who audits it today.
Why it is safe to try
Four reasons the $299 is a low-risk test
- 7-day refundIf the Territory Report is not useful, email us within 7 days of delivery and we refund it in full, no questions asked.
- One payment, no subscription$299 once for one state. Nothing renews.
- Every row has its filingEach supported row links to the public filing it was read from, so you can check it.
- Public records onlyClearinghouse filings, IRS Form 990 data and issuer-posted RFPs. No contact list is sold.
Want a weekly nudge instead?
Get the 3 newest audit signals in Mississippi next Thursday — free.
One email a week. Unsubscribe in one click.
We describe the public record and when it changed. We never state that an organization intends to change providers, that an engagement is ending, or who audits an organization today.