Live preview · South Dakota

South Dakota nonprofit audit accounts — live public-data preview

A limited view of how AuditRadar organizes public Single Audit records and account changes for CPA-firm review.

Every supported row links to evidence. One organization is named so you can check the data against its own filing; the rest are in the file.

Open the South Dakota sample files Get the South Dakota report — $299

See the 15 accounts below

Data as of 2026-11-06 · Source: Federal Audit Clearinghouse (public data) · South Dakota · 15 of 162 accounts shown · Solicitations are checked against the issuer's own page on every crawl, at least weekly.

Updated weekly from the Federal Audit ClearinghouseLast pull Nov 15Newest filing in our data Nov 6Next pull Nov 22177 nonprofit single audits accepted Oct 26–Nov 1

162scored accounts in South Dakota
Up to 300ranked in your file, every name shown
15shown free on this page

162nonprofit audit accounts on record in South Dakota
6crossed the single audit threshold

Source: Federal Audit Clearinghouse · Data as of 2026-11-06. Every number is a count of public filings, not an estimate.

How a row is built

From a public filing to a ranked account

FAC recordsEvery nonprofit Single Audit filed with the Clearinghouse
Year-over-year comparisonEach filing against the prior comparable one
Detected changeAuditor, first single audit, findings, threshold
Evidence linkThe filing the change was read from
Ranked territory reviewYour state, most worth reviewing first

The accounts

South Dakota accounts, ranked by opportunity signal

This preview is not a list of organizations looking for a new auditor. It is a sample of accounts with public-record changes worth reviewing. Open Why this row is here on any row for the observed fact, why it may merit review, what it does not mean, and the filing it came from.

The three numbers behind the order — opportunity signal, fit and the pursuit label — are explained on the method page.

Why these 15 accounts are on the list

First single audit8
New significant deficiency4
Auditor changed1
Paid preparer changed (990)1
New material weakness1

Ranked by opportunity signal, then fit
Organization	City	Federal expenditures	Most recently observed auditor	Signal	Pursue?	Source
Dakota Plains Legal Services	MISSION	$2,629,164	CliftonLarsonAllen LLP	Auditor changed 2025 Why this row is here Observed: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement. Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	MITCHELL	$1,453,650	ELO CPAs & Advisors	First single audit 2025 Why this row is here Observed: A Single Audit filing appears for this organization for the first time in the comparison history AuditRadar holds. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: A first single audit usually means new federal funding and new compliance work. Does not mean: “First observed” is not proof that no earlier audit exists outside the available records. Evidence: The filing on app.fac.gov and the audit year it was accepted for. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	BERESFORD	$12,221,685	Kinner & Company, Ltd	Paid preparer changed (990) 2024	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	BROOKINGS	$862,867	Eide Bailly LLP	First single audit 2024 Why this row is here Observed: A Single Audit filing appears for this organization for the first time in the comparison history AuditRadar holds. The latest filing held here is audit year 2024. Why it may merit review: A first single audit usually means new federal funding and new compliance work. Does not mean: “First observed” is not proof that no earlier audit exists outside the available records. Evidence: The filing on app.fac.gov and the audit year it was accepted for. Open the filing ↗	Worth a review	FAC report
Name in the full report	RAPID CITY	$1,162,176	Baker Tilly	First single audit 2025 Why this row is here Observed: A Single Audit filing appears for this organization for the first time in the comparison history AuditRadar holds. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: A first single audit usually means new federal funding and new compliance work. Does not mean: “First observed” is not proof that no earlier audit exists outside the available records. Evidence: The filing on app.fac.gov and the audit year it was accepted for. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	RAPID CITY	$1,830,595	Eide Bailly LLP	New significant deficiency 2025 Why this row is here Observed: The latest filing reports a significant deficiency that was not reported in the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: It is a public, dated change in what the auditor reported about internal control. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization broke a rule, or that it is changing auditor. Evidence: The findings section of both filings on app.fac.gov. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	WINNER	$14,341,266	Eide Bailly LLP	New significant deficiency 2025 Why this row is here Observed: The latest filing reports a significant deficiency that was not reported in the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: It is a public, dated change in what the auditor reported about internal control. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization broke a rule, or that it is changing auditor. Evidence: The findings section of both filings on app.fac.gov. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	SIOUX FALLS	$6,468,544	Wohlenberg Ritzman & Co., LLC	New significant deficiency 2024 Why this row is here Observed: The latest filing reports a significant deficiency that was not reported in the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2024. Why it may merit review: It is a public, dated change in what the auditor reported about internal control. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization broke a rule, or that it is changing auditor. Evidence: The findings section of both filings on app.fac.gov. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	BATH	$1,183,922	Eide Bailly LLP	First single audit 2025 Why this row is here Observed: A Single Audit filing appears for this organization for the first time in the comparison history AuditRadar holds. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: A first single audit usually means new federal funding and new compliance work. Does not mean: “First observed” is not proof that no earlier audit exists outside the available records. Evidence: The filing on app.fac.gov and the audit year it was accepted for. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	WALL	$1,114,700	Eide Bailly LLP	First single audit 2024 Why this row is here Observed: A Single Audit filing appears for this organization for the first time in the comparison history AuditRadar holds. The latest filing held here is audit year 2024. Why it may merit review: A first single audit usually means new federal funding and new compliance work. Does not mean: “First observed” is not proof that no earlier audit exists outside the available records. Evidence: The filing on app.fac.gov and the audit year it was accepted for. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	BROOKINGS	$1,751,303	Eide Bailly LLP	New significant deficiency 2025 Why this row is here Observed: The latest filing reports a significant deficiency that was not reported in the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: It is a public, dated change in what the auditor reported about internal control. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization broke a rule, or that it is changing auditor. Evidence: The findings section of both filings on app.fac.gov. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	HOT SPRINGS	$3,492,630	KETEL THORSTENSON, LLP	First single audit 2025 Why this row is here Observed: A Single Audit filing appears for this organization for the first time in the comparison history AuditRadar holds. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: A first single audit usually means new federal funding and new compliance work. Does not mean: “First observed” is not proof that no earlier audit exists outside the available records. Evidence: The filing on app.fac.gov and the audit year it was accepted for. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	HURON	$1,117,784	ELO CPAs & Advisors	First single audit 2024 Why this row is here Observed: A Single Audit filing appears for this organization for the first time in the comparison history AuditRadar holds. The latest filing held here is audit year 2024. Why it may merit review: A first single audit usually means new federal funding and new compliance work. Does not mean: “First observed” is not proof that no earlier audit exists outside the available records. Evidence: The filing on app.fac.gov and the audit year it was accepted for. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report
Name in the full report	YANKTON	$1,286,102	Wohlenberg Ritzman & Co., LLC	New material weakness 2025 Why this row is here Observed: The latest filing reports a material weakness that was not reported in the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: A new material weakness is a change in the control environment the next audit has to address. Does not mean: It does not mean the audit was performed poorly, nor that the organization wants a different auditor. Evidence: The findings section of both filings on app.fac.gov. Open the filing ↗	Worth a review	FAC report
Name in the full report	PINE RIDGE	$850,522	Ketel Thorstenson, LLP	First single audit 2024 Why this row is here Observed: A Single Audit filing appears for this organization for the first time in the comparison history AuditRadar holds. The latest filing held here is audit year 2024. Why it may merit review: A first single audit usually means new federal funding and new compliance work. Does not mean: “First observed” is not proof that no earlier audit exists outside the available records. Evidence: The filing on app.fac.gov and the audit year it was accepted for. Open the filing ↗	Strong fit	FAC report

The Thursday email

This is the email South Dakota subscribers get on Thursday

Built just now from this week's own South Dakota filings by the code that sends it — not a screenshot. It holds 9 accounts this week; 3 of them are printed here in full. Every account carries why it is on the list now, why it fits your practice, the filing it was read from and what to do next.

One email a week, on Thursday. Nothing else.
Ranked with your own practice profile, not a generic list.
Names the federal programs your firm already audits, on the accounts that share them.
Every account links to the public filing behind it.
Unsubscribe in one click, in every email.

AuditRadar · Thursday · to you

South Dakota: 9 account(s) to review, 0 verified RFP(s) — week of 2026-11-14

9Accounts to reviewRanked for your firm
0Verified RFPsOpen solicitations this week
0Account changesObserved on FAC filings

This week's accounts

Named in your emailSTURGIS, SD · Fit 87 of 100Year end soon
Why now
Next fiscal year end Dec 31, 2026; the same audit firm is named on 10 consecutive FAC reports.
Why you
ICP fit is 87 of 100 against the profile in use.
Evidence
The FAC report is linked in your email
Next
Latest FAC report: fiscal year ended Dec 31, 2025. The contact the organization filed with FAC is on the account page.
Named in your emailWINNER, SD · Fit 83 of 100Year end soon
Why now
Next fiscal year end Dec 31, 2026; the same audit firm is named on 8 consecutive FAC reports.
Why you
ICP fit is 83 of 100 against the profile in use.
Evidence
The FAC report is linked in your email
Next
Latest FAC report: fiscal year ended Dec 31, 2025. The contact the organization filed with FAC is on the account page.
Named in your emailRAPID CITY, SD · Fit 81 of 100Year end soon
Why now
Next fiscal year end Dec 31, 2026; the same audit firm is named on 10 consecutive FAC reports.
Why you
ICP fit is 81 of 100 against the profile in use.
Evidence
The FAC report is linked in your email
Next
Latest FAC report: fiscal year ended Dec 31, 2025. The contact the organization filed with FAC is on the account page.

6 more accounts in this week's emailEach one with the same four lines, the organization named, and the filing it was read from.

Get this emailTerritory Watch sends the ranked South Dakota email every week, with every account named. $447 per 3 months ($149/mo).Start Territory Watch Compare plans

Built 2026-11-14 from Federal Audit Clearinghouse filings; FAC last synced 2026-11-06. Reports accepted since 2026-11-07 count as new this week. This example is ranked with the default profile; your own email is ranked with your firm’s. One organization may be named on this page; on every other row the name, the FAC report id and the evidence link are left on the server, not hidden in the page. We describe the public record and when it changed — never that an organization intends to change auditor, and never who audits it today.

Why it is safe to try

Four reasons the $299 is a low-risk test

7-day refundIf the Territory Report is not useful, email us within 7 days of delivery and we refund it in full, no questions asked.
One payment, no subscription$299 once for one state. Nothing renews.
Every row has its filingEach supported row links to the public filing it was read from, so you can check it.
Public records onlyClearinghouse filings, IRS Form 990 data and issuer-posted RFPs. No contact list is sold.