XLSX
The working spreadsheet
Every ranked Kentucky account on one row: signal, most recently observed auditor, federal expenditures, pursuit label and the evidence link. Sort it, filter it, assign it.
Free sample · Kentucky Territory Report
The Kentucky nonprofits whose audit record changed, ranked and sourced
7 Kentucky nonprofits named a different auditor on their 2025 filing than in 2024, not counting renamed or combined firms. Finding them yourself means opening the Clearinghouse filing by filing and comparing each with the year before. The Territory Report does that for your whole state. This page is a free sample, built from the same data.
Get the full Kentucky report — $299 See the sample accounts
- 7-day refund
- One-time, no subscription
- Every row linked to its filing
Data as of 2026-09-09 · Source: Federal Audit Clearinghouse (public data) · Kentucky · 15 of 227 accounts shown
- 227accounts on record in Kentucky
- Up to 300ranked in your file, every name shown
- 15shown free on this page
- 227nonprofit audit accounts on record in Kentuckyaudit year 2025
- 7named a different audit firm than the prior year, not counting renamed or combined firmsaudit years 2024–2025
- 8crossed the single audit thresholdaudit year 2025
- 30 of 227reported at least one findingaudit year 2025
Source: Federal Audit Clearinghouse · Data as of 2026-09-09. Every number is a count of public filings, not an estimate.
How a row is built
From a public filing to a ranked account
- FAC recordsEvery nonprofit Single Audit filed with the Clearinghouse
- Year-over-year comparisonEach filing against the prior comparable one
- Detected changeAuditor, first single audit, findings, threshold
- Evidence linkThe filing the change was read from
- Ranked territory reviewYour state, most worth reviewing first
The accounts
The top 15 Kentucky accounts, as the report ranks them
Built from public FAC records. One organization is named so you can check the data against its own filing; the rest are in the file. Every supported row links to the filing it came from. Open Why this row is here on any row for the observed fact and what it does not mean.
Why these 15 accounts are on the list
- Auditor changed4
- Federal spend growth3
- First single audit3
- New significant deficiency3
- New material noncompliance1
- Paid preparer changed (990)1
| Organization | City | Federal expenditures | Most recently observed auditor | Signal | Pursue? | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAMILY SCHOLAR HOUSE, INC | LOUISVILLE | $10,122,987 | Donovan CPAs | Auditor changed 2025Why this row is hereObserved: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement. Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗ | Strong fit | FAC report |
| Name in the full report | CORBIN | $3,379,035 | Abner & Cox, PLLC | Federal spend growth 2024Why this row is hereObserved: Federal expenditures on the latest filing are at least 1.5 times the prior comparable filing, and the increase is at least $500,000. Figures are nominal, as reported. The latest filing held here is audit year 2024. Why it may merit review: A larger federal program footprint usually means more major programs to audit. Does not mean: It does not mean the current engagement is at risk or that the audit fee has changed. Evidence: The expenditure totals on both filings, with the year each covers. Open the filing ↗ | Strong fit | FAC report |
| Name in the full report | LOUISVILLE | $1,071,822 | Alta CPA Group | First single audit 2024Why this row is hereObserved: A Single Audit filing appears for this organization for the first time in the comparison history AuditRadar holds. The latest filing held here is audit year 2024. Why it may merit review: A first single audit usually means new federal funding and new compliance work. Does not mean: “First observed” is not proof that no earlier audit exists outside the available records. Evidence: The filing on app.fac.gov and the audit year it was accepted for. Open the filing ↗ | Strong fit | FAC report |
| Name in the full report | HARTFORD | $21,623,567 | Johnson, Hickey, & Murchison, P.C. | New significant deficiency 2024Why this row is hereObserved: The latest filing reports a significant deficiency that was not reported in the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2024. Why it may merit review: It is a public, dated change in what the auditor reported about internal control. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization broke a rule, or that it is changing auditor. Evidence: The findings section of both filings on app.fac.gov. Open the filing ↗ | Strong fit | FAC report |
| Name in the full report | LEXINGTON | $7,195,050 | Miller Mayer Sullivan Stevens LLP | Federal spend growth 2024Why this row is hereObserved: Federal expenditures on the latest filing are at least 1.5 times the prior comparable filing, and the increase is at least $500,000. Figures are nominal, as reported. The latest filing held here is audit year 2024. Why it may merit review: A larger federal program footprint usually means more major programs to audit. Does not mean: It does not mean the current engagement is at risk or that the audit fee has changed. Evidence: The expenditure totals on both filings, with the year each covers. Open the filing ↗ | Worth a review | FAC report |
| Name in the full report | LOUISVILLE | $842,807 | Hicks & Associates CPAs, PLLC | New material noncompliance 2024Why this row is hereObserved: The latest filing reports material noncompliance that was not reported in the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2024. Why it may merit review: Compliance findings add scope to the following year's single audit. Does not mean: It does not mean an enforcement action exists, or that the organization is procuring audit services. Evidence: The findings section of both filings on app.fac.gov. Open the filing ↗ | Worth a review | FAC report |
| Name in the full report | BEREA | $53,240,478 | CohnReznick | Paid preparer changed (990) 2025 | Strong fit | FAC report |
| Name in the full report | WINSTON SALEM | $3,242,006 | Blue & Co., LLC | Auditor changed 2025Why this row is hereObserved: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement. Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗ | Strong fit | FAC report |
| Name in the full report | LOUISVILLE | $1,735,985 | Deming, Malone, Livesay, & Ostroff | Auditor changed 2025Why this row is hereObserved: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement. Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗ | Strong fit | FAC report |
| Name in the full report | LOUISVILLE | $5,314,288 | Blue and Co. LLC | Federal spend growth 2025Why this row is hereObserved: Federal expenditures on the latest filing are at least 1.5 times the prior comparable filing, and the increase is at least $500,000. Figures are nominal, as reported. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: A larger federal program footprint usually means more major programs to audit. Does not mean: It does not mean the current engagement is at risk or that the audit fee has changed. Evidence: The expenditure totals on both filings, with the year each covers. Open the filing ↗ | Strong fit | FAC report |
| Name in the full report | LOUISVILLE | $1,579,684 | Monroe Shine & Co., Inc | First single audit 2024Why this row is hereObserved: A Single Audit filing appears for this organization for the first time in the comparison history AuditRadar holds. The latest filing held here is audit year 2024. Why it may merit review: A first single audit usually means new federal funding and new compliance work. Does not mean: “First observed” is not proof that no earlier audit exists outside the available records. Evidence: The filing on app.fac.gov and the audit year it was accepted for. Open the filing ↗ | Strong fit | FAC report |
| Name in the full report | LOUISVILLE | $14,653,425 | Deming Malone Livesay & Ostroff | Auditor changed 2025Why this row is hereObserved: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement. Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗ | Strong fit | FAC report |
| Name in the full report | LOUISVILLE | $1,687,126 | Deming, Malone, Livesay & Ostroff PSC | New significant deficiency 2025Why this row is hereObserved: The latest filing reports a significant deficiency that was not reported in the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: It is a public, dated change in what the auditor reported about internal control. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization broke a rule, or that it is changing auditor. Evidence: The findings section of both filings on app.fac.gov. Open the filing ↗ | Worth a review | FAC report |
| Name in the full report | MT STERLING | $1,746,689 | Vickie Richardson, CPA, PSC | First single audit 2024Why this row is hereObserved: A Single Audit filing appears for this organization for the first time in the comparison history AuditRadar holds. The latest filing held here is audit year 2024. Why it may merit review: A first single audit usually means new federal funding and new compliance work. Does not mean: “First observed” is not proof that no earlier audit exists outside the available records. Evidence: The filing on app.fac.gov and the audit year it was accepted for. Open the filing ↗ | Strong fit | FAC report |
| Name in the full report | LOUISVILLE | $1,614,468 | Deming, Malone, Livesay & Ostroff PSC | New significant deficiency 2025Why this row is hereObserved: The latest filing reports a significant deficiency that was not reported in the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025. Why it may merit review: It is a public, dated change in what the auditor reported about internal control. Does not mean: It does not mean the organization broke a rule, or that it is changing auditor. Evidence: The findings section of both filings on app.fac.gov. Open the filing ↗ | Worth a review | FAC report |
Rows 2 to 15 are named in the file, with up to 300 ranked accounts in all.Unlock every name — $299
What you get
What you get for $299
Four files for Kentucky, built when you order, plus a data dictionary that defines every column.
CSV
Ready for your CRM
The high-signal accounts as plain CSV, so the list goes straight into the system your team already works from.
PDF
The partner briefing
A printable summary of the territory: the ranking, the signal behind each account and what each signal does not mean.
HTML
Readable anywhere
The same report as a web page, light or dark, that opens in any browser without software.
Every file comes with a data dictionary that defines every column.
Page 1 of the PDF
What does the report look like?
This is page 1 of 5 of the partner briefing PDF exactly as it prints, from the redacted Kentucky build. The report you buy names every row.
- The four headline counts for Kentucky: ranked accounts, auditor changes, first single audits and open RFPs
- The top accounts in rank order, with federal expenditures, primary signal, most recently observed auditor and score
- A next step on every row, and in the paid file an evidence link on every supported row
- The signal legend and the method on the same page, so the reader knows what each signal does not mean
Sample or report
What the paid report adds
This page is the top of the ranking. The file is the whole of it.
| This sample | The Kentucky Territory Report |
|---|---|
| 15 accounts, one named | Up to 300 ranked accounts — 227 in Kentucky, every name shown |
| One change signal per row | Seven signals, each with the observed fact and what it does not mean |
| No federal program detail | Federal expenditures and the top federal programs behind each account |
| No incumbent view | The incumbent landscape: which firms are observed on which filings |
| Open RFPs listed by issuer and deadline | The same rows with the source link and the quoted deadline sentence |
| One web page | XLSX + CSV + PDF + HTML, plus a data dictionary defining every column |
| Rebuilt whenever the data is | One refresh within 30 days, on request |
| Free | $299 one-time, 7-day refund if the file is not useful |
Explicit demand
Open RFPs in Kentucky
No open request for proposals is listed for Kentucky right now. Each one is checked against the issuer's own page on every crawl, at least weekly, and a solicitation is listed only while its deadline can be quoted from the issuer's own page. When one is published, the report lists it first.
After you pay
What happens after you pay
- 1Pay on StripePick your state and pay on Stripe’s own checkout; this site never sees the card.
- 2We build your fileFrom the current Clearinghouse extract. Every solicitation in it is re-checked against the issuer’s page first.
- 3Download link by emailNormally within the hour, and on your account page.
- 4One refresh in 30 daysAsk once for a rebuild on a newer extract.
- 57-day refundIf the file is not useful, ask within seven days and we refund it.
Why not search FAC.gov yourself?
How this differs from what you may already use
| Question | FAC.gov search | AuditRadar |
|---|---|---|
| Shows which nonprofits changed auditor this cycle, ranked? | No — one year at a time, text search on auditor name | Yes — year-over-year diff on every account, with both report IDs |
| Lists open nonprofit audit RFPs, checked against the issuer page? | No — FAC holds completed audits, not solicitations | Yes — deadline quoted from the issuer, re-checked at least weekly |
| What it costs, and who does the diffing | Free — one search at a time; the year-over-year diff is yours to do | $149/mo per territory bundle · $299 one-time state report |
FAC.gov behaviour checked 2026-09-15
Reading the file
How to read the scores
Each account carries three numbers. Opportunity signal scores what changed on the public record. ICP fit scores how closely the account matches a regional nonprofit audit practice. Confidence says how sure the underlying identification is — a comparison that cannot be made confidently is suppressed, not guessed. The exact rules are on the method page.
What each signal means
| Signal | Observed | Why it may merit review | Does not mean |
|---|---|---|---|
| Auditor changed | The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. | It is recent, public provider movement in your territory. | It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement. |
| First single audit | A Single Audit filing appears for this organization for the first time in the comparison history AuditRadar holds. | A first single audit usually means new federal funding and new compliance work. | “First observed” is not proof that no earlier audit exists outside the available records. |
| Federal spend growth | Federal expenditures on the latest filing are at least 1.5 times the prior comparable filing, and the increase is at least $500,000. Figures are nominal, as reported. | A larger federal program footprint usually means more major programs to audit. | It does not mean the current engagement is at risk or that the audit fee has changed. |
| New significant deficiency | The latest filing reports a significant deficiency that was not reported in the prior comparable filing. | It is a public, dated change in what the auditor reported about internal control. | It does not mean the organization broke a rule, or that it is changing auditor. |
| New material noncompliance | The latest filing reports material noncompliance that was not reported in the prior comparable filing. | Compliance findings add scope to the following year's single audit. | It does not mean an enforcement action exists, or that the organization is procuring audit services. |
The same four fields appear on the site, in the report PDF and in the data dictionary; they are read from one file.
Why it is safe to try
Four reasons the $299 is a low-risk test
- 7-day refundNot useful? Ask within seven days of purchase and the $299 comes back.
- One payment, no subscription$299 once for one state. Nothing renews.
- Every row has its filingEach supported row links to the public filing it was read from, so you can check it.
- Public records onlyClearinghouse filings, IRS Form 990 data and issuer-posted RFPs. No contact list is sold.
Kentucky Territory Report
Get the full Kentucky Territory Report
- 227 Kentucky accounts on record, up to 300 ranked in your file
- XLSX, CSV, PDF and HTML, plus a data dictionary
- The signal, the most recently observed auditor and the filing behind every supported row
- One refresh within 30 days · 7-day refund
$299one-time, one state
Get the Kentucky reportSee the live Kentucky previewSecure checkout on Stripe · 7-day refund
We describe the public record and when it changed. We never state that an organization intends to change providers, that an engagement is ending, or who audits an organization today.