Live preview · Texas

Texas nonprofit audit accounts — live public-data preview

A limited view of how AuditRadar organizes public Single Audit records and account changes for CPA-firm review.

Every supported row links to evidence. One organization is named so you can check the data against its own filing; the rest are in the file.

Open the Texas sample files Get the Texas report — $299

See the 15 accounts below

Data as of 2026-11-06 · Source: Federal Audit Clearinghouse (public data) · Texas · 15 of 1,522 accounts shown · Solicitations are checked against the issuer's own page on every crawl, at least weekly.

Updated weekly from the Federal Audit ClearinghouseLast pull Nov 15Newest filing in our data Nov 6Next pull Nov 22177 nonprofit single audits accepted Oct 26–Nov 1

  • 1,522scored accounts in Texas
  • Up to 300ranked in your file, every name shown
  • 15shown free on this page

Source: Federal Audit Clearinghouse · Data as of 2026-11-06. Every number is a count of public filings, not an estimate.

How a row is built

From a public filing to a ranked account

  1. FAC recordsEvery nonprofit Single Audit filed with the Clearinghouse
  2. Year-over-year comparisonEach filing against the prior comparable one
  3. Detected changeAuditor, first single audit, findings, threshold
  4. Evidence linkThe filing the change was read from
  5. Ranked territory reviewYour state, most worth reviewing first

The accounts

Texas accounts, ranked by opportunity signal

This preview is not a list of organizations looking for a new auditor. It is a sample of accounts with public-record changes worth reviewing. Open Why this row is here on any row for the observed fact, why it may merit review, what it does not mean, and the filing it came from.

The three numbers behind the order — opportunity signal, fit and the pursuit label — are explained on the method page.

Why these 15 accounts are on the list

  • Auditor changed5
  • Paid preparer changed (990)4
  • New significant deficiency3
  • New material noncompliance1
  • First single audit1
  • Finance lead changed (990)1
Ranked by opportunity signal, then fit
OrganizationCityFederal expendituresMost recently observed auditorSignalPursue?Source
Permian Basin Regional Council on Alcohol and Drug AbuseODESSA$1,422,392Boring & Company, PCAuditor changed 2025
Why this row is here

Observed: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025.

Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory.

Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement.

Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗

Strong fitFAC report
Name in the full reportPLAINVIEW$1,433,611THOMAS & COMPANY CPA PAPaid preparer changed (990) 2025Strong fitFAC report
Name in the full reportAUSTIN$384,063MONTEMAYOR BRITTON BENDER CAREY PCPaid preparer changed (990) 2024Strong fitFAC report
Name in the full reportSAN ANTONIO$2,438,422Aprio, LLPAuditor changed 2024
Why this row is here

Observed: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2024.

Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory.

Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement.

Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗

Strong fitFAC report
Name in the full reportPORT AUTHUR$4,519,078Carr Riggs & IngramAuditor changed 2025
Why this row is here

Observed: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025.

Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory.

Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement.

Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗

Strong fitFAC report
Name in the full reportHOUSTON$1,063,580721396621New significant deficiency 2025
Why this row is here

Observed: The latest filing reports a significant deficiency that was not reported in the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025.

Why it may merit review: It is a public, dated change in what the auditor reported about internal control.

Does not mean: It does not mean the organization broke a rule, or that it is changing auditor.

Evidence: The findings section of both filings on app.fac.gov. Open the filing ↗

Strong fitFAC report
Name in the full reportTEMPLE$1,386,340742243906New material noncompliance 2024
Why this row is here

Observed: The latest filing reports material noncompliance that was not reported in the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2024.

Why it may merit review: Compliance findings add scope to the following year's single audit.

Does not mean: It does not mean an enforcement action exists, or that the organization is procuring audit services.

Evidence: The findings section of both filings on app.fac.gov. Open the filing ↗

Strong fitFAC report
Name in the full reportDESOTO$2,832,188Logan and Associates PCAuditor changed 2025
Why this row is here

Observed: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025.

Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory.

Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement.

Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗

Strong fitFAC report
Name in the full reportHOUSTON$5,892,870CARR, RIGGS & INGRAM, LLCNew significant deficiency 2025
Why this row is here

Observed: The latest filing reports a significant deficiency that was not reported in the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025.

Why it may merit review: It is a public, dated change in what the auditor reported about internal control.

Does not mean: It does not mean the organization broke a rule, or that it is changing auditor.

Evidence: The findings section of both filings on app.fac.gov. Open the filing ↗

Strong fitFAC report
Name in the full reportDALLAS$905,914Vail & Park, P.C.Paid preparer changed (990) 2025Strong fitFAC report
Name in the full reportGRAND PRAIRIE$1,143,333Bonadio & Co., LLPFirst single audit 2025
Why this row is here

Observed: A Single Audit filing appears for this organization for the first time in the comparison history AuditRadar holds. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025.

Why it may merit review: A first single audit usually means new federal funding and new compliance work.

Does not mean: “First observed” is not proof that no earlier audit exists outside the available records.

Evidence: The filing on app.fac.gov and the audit year it was accepted for. Open the filing ↗

Worth a reviewFAC report
Name in the full reportHOUSTON$3,747,869McConnell Jones LLPNew significant deficiency 2024
Why this row is here

Observed: The latest filing reports a significant deficiency that was not reported in the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2024.

Why it may merit review: It is a public, dated change in what the auditor reported about internal control.

Does not mean: It does not mean the organization broke a rule, or that it is changing auditor.

Evidence: The findings section of both filings on app.fac.gov. Open the filing ↗

Strong fitFAC report
Name in the full reportHOUSTON$5,087,427Whitley Penn, LLPAuditor changed 2025
Why this row is here

Observed: The most recently observed Single Audit filing names a different primary auditor than the prior comparable filing. The latest filing held here is audit year 2025.

Why it may merit review: It is recent, public provider movement in your territory.

Does not mean: It does not mean the organization is currently seeking another auditor or is running a procurement.

Evidence: Both filings on app.fac.gov, the audit year of each, and the name observed on each. Open the filing ↗

Strong fitFAC report
Name in the full reportWAXAHACHIE$5,538,489Scott, Singleton, Fincher & CoPaid preparer changed (990) 2024Strong fitFAC report
Name in the full reportDALLAS$28,814,139Armanino LLPFinance lead changed (990) 2024Strong fitFAC report

The Thursday email

This is the email Texas subscribers get on Thursday

Built just now from this week's own Texas filings by the code that sends it — not a screenshot. It holds 10 accounts this week; 3 of them are printed here in full. Every account carries why it is on the list now, why it fits your practice, the filing it was read from and what to do next.

  • One email a week, on Thursday. Nothing else.
  • Ranked with your own practice profile, not a generic list.
  • Names the federal programs your firm already audits, on the accounts that share them.
  • Every account links to the public filing behind it.
  • Unsubscribe in one click, in every email.

AuditRadar · Thursday · to you

Texas: 10 account(s) to review, 0 verified RFP(s) — week of 2026-11-15

  • 10Accounts to reviewRanked for your firm
  • 0Verified RFPsOpen solicitations this week
  • 3Account changesObserved on FAC filings

This week's accounts

  1. Named in your emailBROWNSVILLE, TX · Fit 85 of 100Strong fit
    Why now
    New material weakness · New significant deficiency on the FAC report accepted Oct 30, 2026 (audit year 2026).
    Why you
    ICP fit is 85 of 100 against the profile in use. The most recently observed auditor has appeared on 11 consecutive periods.
    Evidence
    The FAC report is linked in your email
    Next
    Latest FAC report: fiscal year ended Jan 31, 2026. The contact the organization filed with FAC is on the account page.
  2. Named in your emailFORT WORTH, TX · Fit 75 of 100Strong fit
    Why now
    New material noncompliance · New material weakness on the FAC report accepted Nov 3, 2026 (audit year 2025).
    Why you
    ICP fit is 75 of 100 against the profile in use. The most recently observed auditor has appeared on 8 consecutive periods.
    Evidence
    The FAC report is linked in your email
    Next
    Latest FAC report: fiscal year ended Sep 30, 2025. The contact the organization filed with FAC is on the account page.
  3. Named in your emailSAN ANTONIO, TX · Fit 63 of 100Worth a review
    Why now
    Repeat finding on the FAC report accepted Oct 28, 2026 (audit year 2024).
    Why you
    ICP fit is 63 of 100 against the profile in use. The most recently observed auditor has appeared on 2 consecutive periods.
    Evidence
    The FAC report is linked in your email
    Next
    Latest FAC report: fiscal year ended Dec 31, 2024. The contact the organization filed with FAC is on the account page.
7 more accounts in this week's emailEach one with the same four lines, the organization named, and the filing it was read from.
Get a free letter firstThree Texas signals every Thursday, no card.
Get this emailTerritory Watch sends the ranked Texas email every week, with every account named. $447 per 3 months ($149/mo).Start Territory WatchCompare plans

Built 2026-11-15 from Federal Audit Clearinghouse filings; FAC last synced 2026-11-06. Reports accepted since 2026-11-08 count as new this week. This example is ranked with the default profile; your own email is ranked with your firm’s. One organization may be named on this page; on every other row the name, the FAC report id and the evidence link are left on the server, not hidden in the page. We describe the public record and when it changed — never that an organization intends to change auditor, and never who audits it today.

Why it is safe to try

Four reasons the $299 is a low-risk test

Want a weekly nudge instead?

Get the 3 newest audit signals in Texas next Thursday — free.

One email a week. Unsubscribe in one click.

We describe the public record and when it changed. We never state that an organization intends to change providers, that an engagement is ending, or who audits an organization today.