How Common Are Single Audit Findings Among Michigan Nonprofits?
74 of 577 Michigan nonprofit single audits for audit year 2025 (12.8%) reported at least one finding, and 51 (8.8%) reported a material weakness. Source: Federal Audit Clearinghouse, data as of 2026-10-30.
Data as of Oct 30, 2026 · Source: Federal Audit Clearinghouse (public data)
How common are single audit findings among Michigan nonprofits?
Each row counts one report per organization for that audit year, nonprofit auditees only. A rate is shown as a count over its denominator because a percentage on its own cannot be checked.
| Audit year | Reports | With a finding | Material weakness | Significant deficiency | Repeat finding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 577 | 74 of 577 (12.8%) | 51 of 577 (8.8%) | 76 of 577 (13.2%) | 25 of 577 (4.3%) |
| 2024 | 665 | 99 of 665 (14.9%) | 70 of 665 (10.5%) | 93 of 665 (14.0%) | 27 of 665 (4.1%) |
| 2023 | 613 | 105 of 613 (17.1%) | 84 of 613 (13.7%) | 97 of 613 (15.8%) | 26 of 613 (4.2%) |
| 2022 | 636 | 89 of 636 (14.0%) | 48 of 636 (7.5%) | 86 of 636 (13.5%) | 29 of 636 (4.6%) |
| 2021 | 680 | 120 of 680 (17.6%) | 48 of 680 (7.1%) | 89 of 680 (13.1%) | 30 of 680 (4.4%) |
| 2020 | 559 | 78 of 559 (14.0%) | 26 of 559 (4.7%) | 86 of 559 (15.4%) | 21 of 559 (3.8%) |
| 2019 | 515 | 78 of 515 (15.1%) | 23 of 515 (4.5%) | 67 of 515 (13.0%) | 27 of 515 (5.2%) |
| 2018 | 512 | 86 of 512 (16.8%) | 30 of 512 (5.9%) | 74 of 512 (14.5%) | 31 of 512 (6.1%) |
| 2017 | 544 | 82 of 544 (15.1%) | 30 of 544 (5.5%) | 80 of 544 (14.7%) | 27 of 544 (5.0%) |
| 2016 | 557 | 78 of 557 (14.0%) | 27 of 557 (4.8%) | 83 of 557 (14.9%) | 25 of 557 (4.5%) |
10 of 11 audit years had at least 100 nonprofit reports and are shown; a rate over a dozen reports is not a rate. How we decide what to publish.
How does Michigan compare with the national rate?
Nationally in audit year 2025, 2,715 of 19,478 (13.9%) nonprofit single audits reported at least one finding, and 1,476 of 19,478 (7.6%) reported a material weakness. The Michigan figures above are on the same basis, so the two can be read together.
Which finding types are most common?
The letter is the Federal Audit Clearinghouse's own compliance-requirement code for the finding. It describes what was tested, not how the organization is run.
| FAC requirement code | Findings | Organizations |
|---|---|---|
| L | 28 | 26 |
| N | 24 | 20 |
| I | 14 | 11 |
| C | 7 | 7 |
| E | 7 | 6 |
| B | 7 | 7 |
| M | 6 | 4 |
| P | 6 | 6 |
| H | 4 | 4 |
| A | 3 | 3 |
| AB | 2 | 2 |
| ABC | 1 | 1 |
Read next
- All AuditRadar statistics
- CPA firms that audit Michigan nonprofits
- Michigan single audit statistics
- Michigan nonprofit audit requirements
How we computed this
Counts come from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, one report per organization and audit year, nonprofit auditees only, for Michigan. A resubmission supersedes the filing it replaces rather than being counted twice. An audit year with fewer than 100 nonprofit reports is not published.
Cite this page
AuditRadar. “Michigan Nonprofit Single Audit Findings by Year.” https://getauditradar.com/statistics/nonprofit-audit-findings/mi/. Data as of 2026-10-30.
Turn the aggregate number into accounts you can review.
See ranked Michigan accountsDownload / cite this data