North County Transit District: Single Audit Reports and Findings
North County Transit District filed 10 single audits between 2016 and 2025; the most recently observed auditor is EIDE BAILLY LLP (2025), and the 2025 report lists 0 findings. Data as of 2026-09-18.
Data as of Sep 18, 2026 · Source: Federal Audit Clearinghouse (public data)
Single audits by year
One row per audit year as the Federal Audit Clearinghouse accepted it. The auditor named is the one observed on that filing; North County Transit District is recorded in OCEANSIDE, California under EIN 953009680, and the Clearinghouse records it as a local government.
| Audit year | Fiscal year end | Federal expended | Threshold applied | Auditor observed | Findings | MW / SD | FAC report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2025-06-30 | $92,195,674 | $2,765,870 | EIDE BAILLY LLP | 0 | — | 2025-06-GSAFAC-0000396935 |
| 2024 | 2024-06-30 | $68,062,514 | $2,041,875 | EIDE BAILLY LLP | 0 | — | 2024-06-GSAFAC-0000347431 |
| 2023 | 2023-06-30 | $57,605,338 | $1,728,160 | EIDE BAILLY LLP | 0 | — | 2023-06-GSAFAC-0000015426 |
| 2022 | 2022-06-30 | $86,526,524 | $2,595,796 | EIDE BAILLY LLP | 0 | — | 2022-06-CENSUS-0000182960 |
| 2021 | 2021-06-30 | $77,085,023 | $2,312,551 | EIDE BAILLY LLP | 0 | — | 2021-06-CENSUS-0000182960 |
| 2020 | 2020-06-30 | $56,279,021 | $1,688,371 | EIDE BAILLY LLP | 0 | — | 2020-06-CENSUS-0000182960 |
| 2019 | 2019-06-30 | $32,530,907 | $975,927 | EIDE BAILLY LLP | 1 | SD | 2019-06-CENSUS-0000182960 |
| 2018 | 2018-06-30 | $29,667,474 | $964,520 | MACIAS GINI & O'CONNELL LLP | 0 | — | 2018-06-CENSUS-0000182960 |
| 2017 | 2017-06-30 | $38,473,957 | $1,154,219 | MACIAS GINI & O'CONNELL LLP | 0 | — | 2017-06-CENSUS-0000182960 |
| 2016 | 2016-06-30 | $20,129,684 | $750,000 | MACIAS GINI & O'CONNELL LLP | 0 | — | 2016-06-CENSUS-0000182960 |
Which federal programs did this organization report?
From the most recent accepted report. "Major" is the designation the auditor made under 2 CFR 200.518, not ours.
| ALN | Program | Expended | Major |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20.526 | BUSES AND BUS FACILITIES FORMULA, COMPETITIVE, AND LOW OR NO EMISSIONS PROGRAMS | $21,287,810 | Yes |
| 20.507 | FEDERAL TRANSIT FORMULA GRANTS | $21,168,881 | Yes |
| 20.507 | FEDERAL TRANSIT FORMULA GRANTS | $18,792,556 | Yes |
| 20.525 | STATE OF GOOD REPAIR GRANTS PROGRAM | $12,699,551 | Yes |
| 20.525 | STATE OF GOOD REPAIR GRANTS PROGRAM | $7,346,726 | Yes |
| 20.525 | STATE OF GOOD REPAIR GRANTS PROGRAM | $3,305,259 | Yes |
| 20.326 | FEDERAL-STATE PARTNERSHIP FOR INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL | $1,730,015 | No |
| 20.507 | FEDERAL TRANSIT FORMULA GRANTS | $1,161,529 | Yes |
| 20.507 | FEDERAL TRANSIT FORMULA GRANTS | $711,917 | Yes |
| 20.525 | STATE OF GOOD REPAIR GRANTS PROGRAM | $657,828 | Yes |
| 20.509 | FORMULA GRANTS FOR RURAL AREAS AND TRIBAL TRANSIT PROGRAM | $627,375 | No |
| 20.507 | FEDERAL TRANSIT FORMULA GRANTS | $564,528 | Yes |
| 20.526 | BUSES AND BUS FACILITIES FORMULA, COMPETITIVE, AND LOW OR NO EMISSIONS PROGRAMS | $410,712 | Yes |
| 20.534 | COMMUNITY PROJECT FUNDING CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING | $373,397 | No |
| 20.526 | BUSES AND BUS FACILITIES FORMULA, COMPETITIVE, AND LOW OR NO EMISSIONS PROGRAMS | $295,259 | Yes |
| 20.507 | FEDERAL TRANSIT FORMULA GRANTS | $258,981 | Yes |
| 20.505 | METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND STATE AND NON-METROPOLITAN PLANNING AND RESEARCH | $248,558 | No |
| 20.534 | COMMUNITY PROJECT FUNDING CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING | $233,773 | No |
| 20.526 | BUSES AND BUS FACILITIES FORMULA, COMPETITIVE, AND LOW OR NO EMISSIONS PROGRAMS | $128,772 | Yes |
| 20.526 | BUSES AND BUS FACILITIES FORMULA, COMPETITIVE, AND LOW OR NO EMISSIONS PROGRAMS | $55,533 | Yes |
| 20.507 | FEDERAL TRANSIT FORMULA GRANTS | $43,384 | Yes |
| 20.525 | STATE OF GOOD REPAIR GRANTS PROGRAM | $33,446 | Yes |
| 20.525 | STATE OF GOOD REPAIR GRANTS PROGRAM | $30,833 | Yes |
| 20.500 | FEDERAL TRANSIT CAPITAL INVESTMENT GRANTS | $11,850 | Yes |
| 20.525 | STATE OF GOOD REPAIR GRANTS PROGRAM | $10,400 | Yes |
What findings did the auditor report?
The reference and the requirement letter are the ones the auditor used. The finding text itself is not reproduced here; the FAC report linked above carries it in full.
The most recent report lists no finding.
Read next
- CPA firms that audit California nonprofits
- California single audit statistics
- California nonprofit audit requirements
How we computed this
Every row comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse record named beside it, one report per audit year, with a resubmission superseding the filing it replaces. The auditor is the one named on that filing — it is not a statement about who audits North County Transit District now. Form 990 figures come from the IRS e-filed return named by its object id. This page exists because the organization filed at least two single audits, or one with a finding.
Cite this page
AuditRadar. “North County Transit District Single Audits and Findings (CA).” https://getauditradar.com/single-audits/ca/north-county-transit-district-953009680/. Data as of 2026-09-18.